Skip to content
PatentBrief
Get alertsTop ↑

How RSA Public-Key Encryption Keeps Digital Messages Secret

This patent describes the foundational RSA algorithm, a method for securely sending messages where anyone can encrypt a message using a public key, but only the intended recipient can decrypt it using a secret private key.

Granted 1983ExpiredExpired 2000Owned by Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyInvented by Leonard M. Adleman, Ronald L. Rivest, Adi Shamir

Original patent title: “Cryptographic communications system and method

Plain-English explanation by SahiLast reviewed · June 13, 2026

This patent describes the foundational RSA algorithm, a method for securely sending messages where anyone can encrypt a message using a public key, but only the intended recipient can decrypt it using a secret private key. Granted to Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1983 with 52 claims and 1,015 forward citations, and it is now in the public domain.

Coverage

What does this patent actually cover?

This patent outlines a cryptographic system for secure communication. A sender transforms a message, represented as a number M, into a secret ciphertext C. This is done by calculating M raised to a specific power 'e' and then finding the remainder when that result is divided by a large composite number 'n' (C ≡ M^e (mod n)), as described in ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 1. The numbers 'e' and 'n' form the public key. The intended receiver then takes this ciphertext C and transforms it back into the original message M' using their secret private key, which involves raising C to a different power 'd' and again finding the remainder when divided by 'n' (M' ≡ C^d (mod n)). For example, if Alice wants to send a secret message to Bob, she uses Bob's public key (e, n) to encrypt her message. Only Bob, who knows the secret 'd' (his private key), can decrypt it.

The gap

What does this patent NOT cover?

  • Does not cover symmetric encryption systems where the same key is used for both encryption and decryption.
  • Does not cover cryptographic methods that do not rely on modular exponentiation (M^e mod n) for encryption and decryption.
  • Does not cover systems where the modulus 'n' is not the product of two prime numbers, 'p' and 'q', as specified in ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 1.
  • Does not cover encryption schemes that do not use a public exponent 'e' that is relatively prime to lcm(p-1, q-1), as defined in ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 1.
  • Does not cover methods for key exchange that don't rely on the specific mathematical properties of RSA, such as Diffie-Hellman.

These exclusions are unique to PatentBrief — derived from the actual claim language, not patent-office boilerplate.

Key facts

Patent numberUS 4405829
StatusExpired
FieldSoftware & Internet
AssigneeMassachusetts Institute of Technology
InventorsLeonard M. Adleman, Ronald L. Rivest, Adi Shamir
Filed1977
Granted1983
Expires2000 (expired)
Claims52
Times cited1,015
LitigationNone on record
Value · $90K$288KModest

What made this novel

The true innovation lies in the 'trapdoor function': it's easy to encrypt a message using a public key, but incredibly difficult to reverse the process without a specific piece of secret information (the private key). This asymmetry relies on the mathematical difficulty of factoring large prime numbers.

The Patent Drawing

Representative patent drawing for Cryptographic communications system and method (US 4405829)
Representative figure · US 4405829All figures on Google Patents →
Cryptographic communications s…(Primary claim)softwaretelecommunicationscybersecurityfinanceecommerce

Schematic visualization of the patent's claim structure. Hand-drawn diagrams in progress for each landmark patent.

Where you've seen this

Real-world examples

01

Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols

02

Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) for email encryption

03

Digital signatures for software updates and documents

04

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)

05

Cryptocurrency wallets and transactions

Why it matters

The bigger picture

This patent describes the RSA algorithm, a cornerstone of modern cryptography. It enabled secure digital communications by solving the problem of key distribution, allowing parties to communicate securely without first needing to share a secret key through a secure channel. RSA became widely adopted for securing internet transactions, email, and data storage, fundamentally changing how digital information is protected.

Filed

December 14, 1977

Granted

September 20, 1983

Market context

Who's building on this

Companies in this space

Many companies and organizations continue to build on the principles of RSA. Major technology companies like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon rely on RSA for securing their online services and protecting user data. Cybersecurity firms like Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet integrate RSA into their security products. Open-source projects like OpenSSL also widely implement RSA for various cryptographic tasks.

Market impact

The granting of this patent and the widespread adoption of the RSA algorithm created the foundation for modern secure digital communication. It enabled the growth of e-commerce, secure banking, and private online interactions by providing a robust method for public-key cryptography. This technology became essential for protocols like SSL/TLS, which secure web traffic, making it a critical component of the internet's infrastructure and fostering trust in digital transactions globally.

Claim 1 — Plain English

What this patent covers

This patent outlines a cryptographic system for secure communication. A sender transforms a message, represented as a number M, into a secret ciphertext C. This is done by calculating M raised to a specific power 'e' and then finding the remainder when that result is divided by a large composite number 'n' (C ≡ M^e (mod n)), as described in Claim 1. The numbers 'e' and 'n' form the public key. The intended receiver then takes this ciphertext C and transforms it back into the original message M' using their secret private key, which involves raising C to a different power 'd' and again finding the remainder when divided by 'n' (M' ≡ C^d (mod n)). For example, if Alice wants to send a secret message to Bob, she uses Bob's public key (e, n) to encrypt her message. Only Bob, who knows the secret 'd' (his private key), can decrypt it.

The clever bit

The true innovation lies in the 'trapdoor function': it's easy to encrypt a message using a public key, but incredibly difficult to reverse the process without a specific piece of secret information (the private key). This asymmetry relies on the mathematical difficulty of factoring large prime numbers.

What it does not cover

  • Does not cover symmetric encryption systems where the same key is used for both encryption and decryption.
  • Does not cover cryptographic methods that do not rely on modular exponentiation (M^e mod n) for encryption and decryption.
  • Does not cover systems where the modulus 'n' is not the product of two prime numbers, 'p' and 'q', as specified in Claim 1.
  • Does not cover encryption schemes that do not use a public exponent 'e' that is relatively prime to lcm(p-1, q-1), as defined in Claim 1.
  • Does not cover methods for key exchange that don't rely on the specific mathematical properties of RSA, such as Diffie-Hellman.

Patent timeline

Filing

Application submitted to the patent office

Publication

Application published, typically 18 months after filing

Grant

Patent officially issued

Expiration

Patent enters public domain

This patent is in the public domain

See the Freedom to Build guide — what is free to use, what is not, and how to cite this patent.

View guide →

PatentBrief Score

Impact Score

High impact

Citation count

40/40

Highly cited

Claim breadth

20/20

Very broad protection

Recency

0/20

Older than 20 years

Assignee scale

20/20

Major company or institution

PatentBrief Impact Score — based on citation count, claim breadth, recency, and assignee scale. Not a legal assessment.

Heuristic Value Estimate

What this patent might be worth

Modest

$90K$288K

Midpoint $180K · expired or expiring · industry ×1.5

Adjust inputs →

Heuristic only — blends forward/backward citation counts, claim scope, time remaining, litigation history, and CPC-derived industry baseline. Real valuations need a professional appraisal.

Patent Claims

0 independent claims · 1 dependent

Claims are the legal boundaries of the patent. An independent claim stands alone. A dependent claim adds limitations to its parent, narrowing — but not broadening — the scope.

The original legal language

Original claims

52 claims as filed with the patent office.

Concepts involved

ClaimPrior artNon-obviousnessNoveltySpecificationAssigneePatent term

Citations

Patent lineage

Cites earlier patents

1

earlier patents this invention cites as foundations

View prior art →

Cited by later patents

1,015

later patents that build on this invention

View patents →

Cite this patent

Adleman, L. M., Rivest, R. L., & Shamir, A. (1983). How RSA Public-Key Encryption Keeps Digital Messages Secret (U.S. Patent No. 4,405,829). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://patentbrief.org/patent/us/4405829/rsa-encryption

Auto-generated from the patent record. Double-check author order and the issue date against the official USPTO document before submitting.

Embed

Add this patent to your site

Drop this plain-English patent card into any blog post or article — free, no signup. It always links back to the full breakdown here.

<div data-patentlens-widget data-patent-number="US4405829"></div>
<script src="https://patentbrief.org/embed.js" async></script>

Stay in the loop

Get a weekly digest of new patents.

One email per week. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keep exploring

Related patents you should know

US 4683195 · 1987

How to Make Billions of Copies of a DNA Segment

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a method to rapidly create many copies of a specific piece of DNA or RNA, enabling its detection and analysis.

Cetus Corp

US 8697359 · 2014

How to Edit Genes in Human Cells Using an Engineered CRISPR System

This patent describes an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system for precisely cutting DNA in eukaryotic cells to change how genes work, opening the door for gene editing in complex organisms.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

US 7657849 · 2010

How the iPhone's Slide-to-Unlock Gesture Works

Apple's 2010 patent describes unlocking a device by dragging a specific graphical image across the touchscreen along a predefined path, a gesture that became iconic with the original iPhone.

Apple Inc

US 4733665 · 1988

How Doctors Implant a Permanent Stent Using a Balloon

This patent describes the method for placing a permanent, expandable wire mesh tube inside a blood vessel or other body tube using a balloon-tipped catheter to widen it and keep it open.

Expandable Grafts Partnership

US 4965188 · 1990

How to Make Many Copies of a DNA Piece with Heat

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method, a technique to make millions of copies of a specific DNA segment using a heat-resistant enzyme and repeated temperature changes.

Cetus Corp

US 4235871 · 1980

How to Encapsulate Active Materials in Lipid Bubbles Efficiently

This patent describes a method for trapping biologically active substances inside tiny, multi-layered fat bubbles called liposomes, using a specific water-in-oil emulsion and gel-forming process to improve how much material gets captured.

Individual

Semantically similar

You might also find these interesting

SEARCH ALL

More to explore

More in Software & Internet

Browse all Software & Internet

New to patents?

What is a patent?How to read a patentAnatomy of a claimHow strong is this patent?What the citations meanWhat it doesn't coverSoftware PatentsPatent glossary
Explore the landscape:software patents →telecommunications patents →cybersecurity patents →

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What does How RSA Public-Key Encryption Keeps Digital Messages Secret cover?

This patent describes the foundational RSA algorithm, a method for securely sending messages where anyone can encrypt a message using a public key, but only the intended recipient can decrypt it using a secret private key.

Who owns patent US 4405829?

Massachusetts Institute of Technology owns this patent, granted in 1983.

When does this patent expire?

This patent has expired and is now in the public domain — anyone can use the invention freely.

What is patent US 4405829 cited by?

This patent has been cited by 1015 later patents that build on its ideas.

What problem does this patent solve?

This patent describes the RSA algorithm, a cornerstone of modern cryptography. It enabled secure digital communications by solving the problem of key distribution, allowing parties to communicate securely without first needing to share a secret key through a secure channel. RSA became widely adopted for securing internet transactions, email, and data storage, fundamentally changing how digital information is protected.

What does this patent NOT cover?

Does not cover symmetric encryption systems where the same key is used for both encryption and decryption.

View all →
US 12350368·2025

Delivering Large Gene Editing Tools into Cells with Hybrid Virus-Lipid Packages

US 12252707·2025

How to Make Animals That Can Turn On CRISPR Gene Editing

US 8697359·2014

How to Edit Genes in Human Cells Using an Engineered CRISPR System

US 5961804·1999

Tiny Capsules for Electronic Paper Displays

Patent monitoring

Get notified when Massachusetts Institute of Technology files a new patent

Get notified when this company files a new patent. Weekly digest · Confirm via email · Unsubscribe anytime.

Last reviewed: June 13, 2026 · PatentBrief is not a law firm and this is not legal advice.