Skip to content
PatentBrief
Get alertsTop ↑

Improving AI Predictions by Factoring in How Much You Trust Each Model

This patent describes a method for making an AI system more accurate by combining several individual AI models and giving more weight to the ones considered more trustworthy.

ActiveExpires 2041Owned by NoblisInvented by Nathan KALKA, Janet Anderson, Nicholas D. BARTLOW

Original patent title: “Ensemble machine learning models incorporating a model trust factor

Plain-English explanation by SahiLast reviewed · August 14, 2026

This patent describes a method for making an AI system more accurate by combining several individual AI models and giving more weight to the ones considered more trustworthy. Owned by Noblis with 34 claims and 31 forward citations, and it is expected to expire in 2041.

Coverage

What does this patent actually cover?

This patent describes a method for training an ensemble machine learning model, which is like a team of AI models working together. First, it receives data about how much to trust each individual AI model in the team (ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 1a). This 'trust score' can be based on things like how sensitive the model is to bad input data or how confident its past predictions were (Claim 5). Next, it calculates an estimated prediction error for each model, but this error is adjusted by its trust score (Claim 1b). A less trusted model might have its errors penalized more. Then, it uses these adjusted error estimates to figure out a 'normalized weight' for each model (Claim 1c). Finally, it uses these normalized weights to determine the overall prediction equation for the entire ensemble, giving more influence to the more trusted models (Claim 1d). For example, if you have three AI models predicting stock prices, and one is known to be very reliable with certain types of data, this method would give that reliable model's predictions more say in the final combined forecast.

The gap

What does this patent NOT cover?

  • Does not cover single machine learning models that do not combine predictions from multiple individual models.
  • Does not cover ensemble models that combine predictions without explicitly calculating and using a 'trust score' for each individual model.
  • Does not cover methods where the trust score does not influence the prediction error estimate or the normalized weights of the individual models.
  • Does not cover trust scores that are not real numbers, specifically those outside the 0.0 to 1.0 range as described in ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 3.
  • Does not cover ensemble methods where the output prediction equation is not determined, at least in part, by these normalized weights.

These exclusions are unique to PatentBrief — derived from the actual claim language, not patent-office boilerplate.

Key facts

Patent numberUS 20230044102
StatusActive
FieldAI & Machine Learning
AssigneeNoblis
InventorsNathan KALKA, Janet Anderson, Nicholas D. BARTLOW
Filed2021
Expires2041
Claims34
Times cited31
LitigationNone on record
Value · $276K$885KSubstantial

What made this novel

The clever part is explicitly integrating a 'trust factor' into the mathematical calculation of how much each individual model's prediction contributes to the final combined output. Instead of just relying on past performance metrics, this method allows for a more nuanced understanding of a model's reliability to directly influence its weighting.

The Patent Drawing

Representative patent drawing for Ensemble machine learning models incorporating a model trust factor (US 20230044102)
Representative figure · US 20230044102All figures on Google Patents →
Ensemble machine learning mode…(Primary claim)ai mlsoftwaretelecommunicationsfinancebiotech

Schematic visualization of the patent's claim structure. Hand-drawn diagrams in progress for each landmark patent.

Where you've seen this

Real-world examples

01

Fraud detection systems combining multiple AI models

02

Medical diagnostic tools using various AI algorithms

03

Autonomous vehicle perception systems blending sensor data interpretations

04

Financial forecasting platforms integrating diverse predictive models

05

Cybersecurity threat detection systems

Why it matters

The bigger picture

As AI models become more complex and are used in critical applications like healthcare or finance, ensuring their reliability and accuracy is crucial. This patent offers a way to build more robust AI systems by explicitly incorporating a measure of trust into how multiple models collaborate. This can lead to more dependable predictions, especially when individual models might have varying levels of quality or applicability to different data.

Filed

December 21, 2021

Market context

Who's building on this

Companies in this space

Noblis Inc., the assigneeassigneeThe entity that owns the patent — usually the inventor's employer or a company.Read more →, is a non-profit science, technology, and strategy organization that often works with government agencies. Companies focused on explainable AI (XAI) and trustworthy AI, such as IBM, Google, and Microsoft, are actively researching and developing methods to improve AI reliability and transparency. Startups specializing in AI governance and model risk management also operate in this space.

Market impact

This patent contributes to the growing field of trustworthy AI, which is critical for broader adoption of AI in regulated and high-stakes industries. By offering a structured way to incorporate model trust, it could lead to AI systems that are more resilient to individual model failures or biases. This could reduce risks associated with AI deployment and increase confidence among users and regulators, potentially influencing standards for AI system development and evaluation.

Claim 1 — Plain English

What this patent covers

This patent describes a method for training an ensemble machine learning model, which is like a team of AI models working together. First, it receives data about how much to trust each individual AI model in the team (Claim 1a). This 'trust score' can be based on things like how sensitive the model is to bad input data or how confident its past predictions were (Claim 5). Next, it calculates an estimated prediction error for each model, but this error is adjusted by its trust score (Claim 1b). A less trusted model might have its errors penalized more. Then, it uses these adjusted error estimates to figure out a 'normalized weight' for each model (Claim 1c). Finally, it uses these normalized weights to determine the overall prediction equation for the entire ensemble, giving more influence to the more trusted models (Claim 1d). For example, if you have three AI models predicting stock prices, and one is known to be very reliable with certain types of data, this method would give that reliable model's predictions more say in the final combined forecast.

The clever bit

The clever part is explicitly integrating a 'trust factor' into the mathematical calculation of how much each individual model's prediction contributes to the final combined output. Instead of just relying on past performance metrics, this method allows for a more nuanced understanding of a model's reliability to directly influence its weighting.

What it does not cover

  • Does not cover single machine learning models that do not combine predictions from multiple individual models.
  • Does not cover ensemble models that combine predictions without explicitly calculating and using a 'trust score' for each individual model.
  • Does not cover methods where the trust score does not influence the prediction error estimate or the normalized weights of the individual models.
  • Does not cover trust scores that are not real numbers, specifically those outside the 0.0 to 1.0 range as described in Claim 3.
  • Does not cover ensemble methods where the output prediction equation is not determined, at least in part, by these normalized weights.

Patent timeline

Filing

Application submitted to the patent office

Expiration

Patent enters public domain

PatentBrief Score

Impact Score

Moderate

Citation count

30/40

Moderately cited

Claim breadth

20/20

Very broad protection

Recency

0/20

Older than 20 years

Assignee scale

0/20

Independent or smaller assigneeassigneeThe entity that owns the patent — usually the inventor's employer or a company.Read more →

PatentBrief Impact Score — based on citation count, claim breadth, recency, and assignee scale. Not a legal assessment.

Heuristic Value Estimate

What this patent might be worth

Substantial

$276K$885K

Midpoint $553K · 15.3 yr remaining · industry ×1.6

Adjust inputs →

Heuristic only — blends forward/backward citation counts, claim scope, time remaining, litigation history, and CPC-derived industry baseline. Real valuations need a professional appraisal.

Claim text not yet imported for this patent

The original legal language

Original claims

34 claims as filed with the patent office.

Concepts involved

ClaimPrior artNon-obviousnessNoveltySpecificationAssigneePatent term

Citations

Patent lineage

Cites earlier patents

10

earlier patents this invention cites as foundations

View prior art →

Cited by later patents

31

later patents that build on this invention

View patents →

Cite this patent

KALKA, N., Anderson, J., & BARTLOW, N. D. Improving AI Predictions by Factoring in How Much You Trust Each Model (U.S. Patent No. 20,230,044,102). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://patentbrief.org/patent/us/20230044102/ensemble-machine-learning-models-incorporating-a-model-trust-factor

Auto-generated from the patent record. Double-check author order and the issue date against the official USPTO document before submitting.

Embed

Add this patent to your site

Drop this plain-English patent card into any blog post or article — free, no signup. It always links back to the full breakdown here.

<div data-patentlens-widget data-patent-number="US20230044102"></div>
<script src="https://patentbrief.org/embed.js" async></script>

Stay in the loop

Get a weekly digest of new patents.

One email per week. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keep exploring

Related patents you should know

US 4683195 · 1987

How to Make Billions of Copies of a DNA Segment

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a method to rapidly create many copies of a specific piece of DNA or RNA, enabling its detection and analysis.

Cetus Corp

US 8697359 · 2014

How to Edit Genes in Human Cells Using an Engineered CRISPR System

This patent describes an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system for precisely cutting DNA in eukaryotic cells to change how genes work, opening the door for gene editing in complex organisms.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

US 7657849 · 2010

How the iPhone's Slide-to-Unlock Gesture Works

Apple's 2010 patent describes unlocking a device by dragging a specific graphical image across the touchscreen along a predefined path, a gesture that became iconic with the original iPhone.

Apple Inc

US 4733665 · 1988

How Doctors Implant a Permanent Stent Using a Balloon

This patent describes the method for placing a permanent, expandable wire mesh tube inside a blood vessel or other body tube using a balloon-tipped catheter to widen it and keep it open.

Expandable Grafts Partnership

US 4965188 · 1990

How to Make Many Copies of a DNA Piece with Heat

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method, a technique to make millions of copies of a specific DNA segment using a heat-resistant enzyme and repeated temperature changes.

Cetus Corp

US 4235871 · 1980

How to Encapsulate Active Materials in Lipid Bubbles Efficiently

This patent describes a method for trapping biologically active substances inside tiny, multi-layered fat bubbles called liposomes, using a specific water-in-oil emulsion and gel-forming process to improve how much material gets captured.

Individual

Semantically similar

You might also find these interesting

SEARCH ALL

More to explore

More in AI & Machine Learning

Browse all AI & Machine Learning

New to patents?

What is a patent?How to read a patentAnatomy of a claimHow strong is this patent?What the citations meanWhat it doesn't coverPatent glossary
Explore the landscape:ai ml patents →software patents →telecommunications patents →

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Improving AI Predictions by Factoring in How Much You Trust Each Model cover?

This patent describes a method for making an AI system more accurate by combining several individual AI models and giving more weight to the ones considered more trustworthy.

Who owns patent US 20230044102?

This patent is owned by Noblis.

When does this patent expire?

This patent is expected to expire on December 21, 2041, when the invention enters the public domain.

What is patent US 20230044102 cited by?

This patent has been cited by 31 later patents that build on its ideas.

What problem does this patent solve?

As AI models become more complex and are used in critical applications like healthcare or finance, ensuring their reliability and accuracy is crucial. This patent offers a way to build more robust AI systems by explicitly incorporating a measure of trust into how multiple models collaborate. This can lead to more dependable predictions, especially when individual models might have varying levels of quality or applicability to different data.

What does this patent NOT cover?

Does not cover single machine learning models that do not combine predictions from multiple individual models.

Patent monitoring

Get notified when Noblis files a new patent

Get notified when this company files a new patent. Weekly digest · Confirm via email · Unsubscribe anytime.

Last reviewed: August 14, 2026 · PatentBrief is not a law firm and this is not legal advice.