Skip to content
PatentBrief
Get alertsTop ↑

How AI Explains Cyberattacks for Security Training

This patent describes a cybersecurity training tool that uses a large language model to explain why machine learning identified a cyber threat, based on both fake and real attacks, for security teams and regular users.

ActiveExpires 2044Owned by Darktrace HoldingsInvented by Dickon Humphrey, John Boyer, Philip Sellars + 2 more

Original patent title: “Cyber security training tool that uses a large language model

Plain-English explanation by SahiLast reviewed · June 16, 2026

This patent describes a cybersecurity training tool that uses a large language model to explain why machine learning identified a cyber threat, based on both fake and real attacks, for security teams and regular users. Owned by Darktrace Holdings with 23 claims and 13 forward citations, and it is expected to expire in 2044.

Key facts

Patent numberUS 20240406210
StatusActive
FieldSoftware & Internet
AssigneeDarktrace Holdings
InventorsDickon Humphrey, John Boyer, Philip Sellars and 2 others
Filed2024
Expires2044
Claims23
Times cited13
LitigationNone on record
Value · $120K$383KModest

Coverage

What does this patent actually cover?

The cyber security training tool uses a natural language processor and a large language model (LLM) to analyze cyberattacks. It can look at both a 'synthetic cyberattack' in a fake network that mirrors a real one, and a 'real cyberattack' happening in the actual network (ClaimclaimA numbered sentence at the end of a patent that legally defines what the inventor owns. The most important section.Read more → 1). The tool then provides an analysis and explanation, using the LLM, for why machine learning flagged these attacks as threats. This explanation is designed for training either regular users or cybersecurity team members. For example, it can use the LLM to highlight malicious parts of an email, like a phishing attempt, and explain immediately on screen why the email is dangerous (ClaimsclaimsThe numbered statements at the end of a patent that legally define what the inventor owns.Read more → 4, 5).

The gap

What does this patent NOT cover?

  • Does not cover cybersecurity training that relies solely on human instructors without machine learning analysis of threats.
  • Does not cover systems that only analyze real cyberattacks without also using a mimic network for synthetic attacks.
  • Does not cover training tools that explain cyber threats without using a large language model.
  • Does not cover general IT security awareness training that isn't specifically tied to machine learning's identification of a threat.
  • Does not cover systems that only provide long-form reports days later, rather than immediate, on-the-spot feedback for users.
  • Does not cover training that doesn't involve a user interface displaying the explanation and understanding of the machine learning.

These exclusions are unique to PatentBrief — derived from the actual claim language, not patent-office boilerplate.

What made this novel

The truly novel aspect is using a large language model not just to detect threats, but to translate complex machine learning detections and network data into understandable, natural language explanations for human training.

The Patent Drawing

Representative patent drawing for Cyber security training tool that uses a large language model (US 20240406210)
Representative figure · US 20240406210All figures on Google Patents →
Cyber security training tool t…(Primary claim)cybersecuritysoftwareai mltelecommunicationsconsumer electronics

Schematic visualization of the patent's claim structure. Hand-drawn diagrams in progress for each landmark patent.

Where you've seen this

Real-world examples

01

Darktrace's AI-driven security platforms

02

Security awareness training platforms with AI explainability

03

Phishing simulation and training tools that provide immediate feedback

04

AI-powered security operations center (SOC) tools

Why it matters

The bigger picture

Understanding complex cyber threats and the sophisticated machine learning models that detect them is a major challenge for both technical staff and everyday users. This patent addresses this by making the 'why' behind a threat detection accessible through AI-powered explanations. This can significantly improve how quickly and effectively people learn to identify and respond to cyber risks, reducing human error in a critical area.

Filed

May 30, 2024

Market context

Who's building on this

Companies in this space

Darktrace Holdings Ltd, the assigneeassigneeThe entity that owns the patent — usually the inventor's employer or a company.Read more →, is actively developing and deploying AI-driven cybersecurity solutions that align with this patent's scope. Other major cybersecurity vendors and startups are also integrating large language models into their threat detection, analysis, and training platforms to enhance explainability and user understanding.

Market impact

This patent reflects a growing trend in the cybersecurity market towards leveraging advanced AI, specifically large language models, to make complex security insights more digestible. It enables more effective training programs, potentially reducing the 'human factor' in security breaches. The focus on immediate, understandable feedback could set a new standard for security awareness tools, pushing competitors to integrate similar AI-powered explanation capabilities.

Claim 1 — Plain English

What this patent covers

The cyber security training tool uses a natural language processor and a large language model (LLM) to analyze cyberattacks. It can look at both a 'synthetic cyberattack' in a fake network that mirrors a real one, and a 'real cyberattack' happening in the actual network (Claim 1). The tool then provides an analysis and explanation, using the LLM, for why machine learning flagged these attacks as threats. This explanation is designed for training either regular users or cybersecurity team members. For example, it can use the LLM to highlight malicious parts of an email, like a phishing attempt, and explain immediately on screen why the email is dangerous (Claims 4, 5).

The clever bit

The truly novel aspect is using a large language model not just to detect threats, but to translate complex machine learning detections and network data into understandable, natural language explanations for human training.

What it does not cover

  • Does not cover cybersecurity training that relies solely on human instructors without machine learning analysis of threats.
  • Does not cover systems that only analyze real cyberattacks without also using a mimic network for synthetic attacks.
  • Does not cover training tools that explain cyber threats without using a large language model.
  • Does not cover general IT security awareness training that isn't specifically tied to machine learning's identification of a threat.
  • Does not cover systems that only provide long-form reports days later, rather than immediate, on-the-spot feedback for users.
  • Does not cover training that doesn't involve a user interface displaying the explanation and understanding of the machine learning.

Patent timeline

Filing

Application submitted to the patent office

Expiration

Patent enters public domain

PatentBrief Score

Impact Score

Early stage

Citation count

23/40

Moderately cited

Claim breadth

15/20

Broad claimsclaimsThe numbered statements at the end of a patent that legally define what the inventor owns.Read more →

Recency

0/20

Older than 20 years

Assignee scale

0/20

Independent or smaller assigneeassigneeThe entity that owns the patent — usually the inventor's employer or a company.Read more →

PatentBrief Impact Score — based on citation count, claim breadth, recency, and assignee scale. Not a legal assessment.

Heuristic Value Estimate

What this patent might be worth

Modest

$120K$383K

Midpoint $240K · 18.0 yr remaining · industry ×1.6

Adjust inputs →

Heuristic only — blends forward/backward citation counts, claim scope, time remaining, litigation history, and CPC-derived industry baseline. Real valuations need a professional appraisal.

The original legal language

Original claims

23 claims as filed with the patent office.

Concepts involved

ClaimPrior artNon-obviousnessNoveltySpecificationAssigneePatent term

Citations

Patent lineage

Cites earlier patents

12

earlier patents this invention cites as foundations

View prior art →

Cited by later patents

13

later patents that build on this invention

View patents →

Cite this patent

Humphrey, D., Boyer, J., Sellars, P., Bazalgette, T., & Lal, J. How AI Explains Cyberattacks for Security Training (U.S. Patent No. 20,240,406,210). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://patentbrief.org/patent/us/20240406210/cyber-security-training-tool-that-uses-a-large-language-model

Auto-generated from the patent record. Double-check author order and the issue date against the official USPTO document before submitting.

Embed

Add this patent to your site

Drop this plain-English patent card into any blog post or article — free, no signup. It always links back to the full breakdown here.

<div data-patentlens-widget data-patent-number="US20240406210"></div>
<script src="https://patentbrief.org/embed.js" async></script>

Stay in the loop

Get a weekly digest of new patents.

One email per week. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keep exploring

Related patents you should know

US 4683195 · 1987

How to Make Billions of Copies of a DNA Segment

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a method to rapidly create many copies of a specific piece of DNA or RNA, enabling its detection and analysis.

Cetus Corp

US 8697359 · 2014

How to Edit Genes in Human Cells Using an Engineered CRISPR System

This patent describes an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system for precisely cutting DNA in eukaryotic cells to change how genes work, opening the door for gene editing in complex organisms.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

US 7657849 · 2010

How the iPhone's Slide-to-Unlock Gesture Works

Apple's 2010 patent describes unlocking a device by dragging a specific graphical image across the touchscreen along a predefined path, a gesture that became iconic with the original iPhone.

Apple Inc

US 4733665 · 1988

How Doctors Implant a Permanent Stent Using a Balloon

This patent describes the method for placing a permanent, expandable wire mesh tube inside a blood vessel or other body tube using a balloon-tipped catheter to widen it and keep it open.

Expandable Grafts Partnership

US 4965188 · 1990

How to Make Many Copies of a DNA Piece with Heat

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method, a technique to make millions of copies of a specific DNA segment using a heat-resistant enzyme and repeated temperature changes.

Cetus Corp

US 4235871 · 1980

How to Encapsulate Active Materials in Lipid Bubbles Efficiently

This patent describes a method for trapping biologically active substances inside tiny, multi-layered fat bubbles called liposomes, using a specific water-in-oil emulsion and gel-forming process to improve how much material gets captured.

Individual

Semantically similar

You might also find these interesting

SEARCH ALL

More to explore

More in Software & Internet

Browse all Software & Internet

New to patents?

What is a patent?How to read a patentAnatomy of a claimHow strong is this patent?What the citations meanWhat it doesn't coverSoftware PatentsPatent glossary

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What does How AI Explains Cyberattacks for Security Training cover?

This patent describes a cybersecurity training tool that uses a large language model to explain why machine learning identified a cyber threat, based on both fake and real attacks, for security teams and regular users.

Who owns patent US 20240406210?

This patent is owned by Darktrace Holdings.

When does this patent expire?

This patent is expected to expire on May 30, 2044, when the invention enters the public domain.

What is patent US 20240406210 cited by?

This patent has been cited by 13 later patents that build on its ideas.

What problem does this patent solve?

Understanding complex cyber threats and the sophisticated machine learning models that detect them is a major challenge for both technical staff and everyday users. This patent addresses this by making the 'why' behind a threat detection accessible through AI-powered explanations. This can significantly improve how quickly and effectively people learn to identify and respond to cyber risks, reducing human error in a critical area.

What does this patent NOT cover?

Does not cover cybersecurity training that relies solely on human instructors without machine learning analysis of threats.

Same assignee

More from Darktrace Holdings

View all →
US 11606373·2023

AI System That Learns Normal Email Use to Spot and Stop Cyber Threats

Patent monitoring

Get notified when Darktrace Holdings files a new patent

Get notified when this company files a new patent. Weekly digest · Confirm via email · Unsubscribe anytime.

Last reviewed: June 16, 2026 · PatentBrief is not a law firm and this is not legal advice.