Skip to content
PatentBrief
← Glossary/W

Written description

Definition

A requirement under 35 USC § 112 that an inventorinventorThe person who actually conceived the invention. Listed on the patent regardless of who owns it.Read more → must demonstrate, through the specificationspecificationThe main body of the patent — describes the invention in detail. Used to interpret the claims.Read more →, that they actually possessed the claimed invention at the time of filing — not just that they had a vague idea. Written descriptionwritten description112 requirement: the inventor must show they actually possessed the claimed invention at filing — not just had a vague idea.Read more → is separate from enablementenablement112 requirement: the patent must teach a skilled person to make and use the invention without undue experimentation. Broad claims can fail enablement.Read more →: enablement asks whether the reader can make the invention; written description asks whether the inventor had already conceived it. Failing the written description requirement is common when inventors try to add new matter to a continuationcontinuationA new patent application that claims priority to an earlier still-pending parent application.Read more →.

Related terms

Keep going

Abstract

A brief summary (300 words or fewer) that appears at the top of every patent. The abstract describes what the invention does in general terms. Legally, it has almost no weight — courts use the claims to determine what a patent covers, not the abstract. The abstract is useful mainly for quickly scanning patents during a prior art search.

Anticipation

A legal standard for rejecting a patent claim. If every element of a claim was already disclosed in a single prior art reference — in a patent, article, or product — the claim is "anticipated" and cannot be patented. Anticipation requires a single source to contain every element; if you need two sources, it's an obviousness argument, not anticipation.

Appeal

A request to have a patent examiner's rejection reviewed by a higher authority. After receiving multiple rejections, an applicant can appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) within the USPTO, and from there to federal court. Appeals are expensive and slow, but sometimes necessary when an examiner applies the law incorrectly.

Art unit

A group of patent examiners at the USPTO who specialize in a particular technology area. Each application is assigned to the art unit whose examiners are trained in the relevant field. The art unit assignment matters because examiner expertise — and rejection rates — vary significantly across technology areas.

Assignee

The legal owner of a patent, who may or may not be the inventor. When an employee invents something in the course of their employment, most companies require inventors to assign patent rights to the employer. The assignee appears on the patent document and has the right to license or enforce the patent.

Basis for rejection

The specific legal grounds a patent examiner cites when refusing to allow a claim. Common bases include lack of novelty (35 USC § 102), obviousness (35 USC § 103), failure to fully describe the invention (35 USC § 112), and unpatentable subject matter (35 USC § 101). An office action will state the basis for each rejection, and applicants must address each one in their response.

See written description in real patents:

Search PatentBrief →