Enablement

Cross-referenced

Patent

A government-granted right that gives an inventor the exclusive right to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing a patented invention within the country that granted the patent, for a limited time. A patent does not give the owner the right to practice the invention — only the right to exclude others. The US issues three types: utility, design, and plant patents.

Cross-referenced

Specification

The written description portion of a patent application — everything except the claims. The specification must describe the invention in enough detail that someone skilled in the field could make and use it. It typically includes background of the invention, a summary, a description of the drawings, and a detailed description of at least one embodiment. Courts use the specification to interpret what claim terms mean.

Cross-referenced

Written description

A requirement under 35 USC § 112 that an inventor must demonstrate, through the specification, that they actually possessed the claimed invention at the time of filing — not just that they had a vague idea. Written description is separate from enablement: enablement asks whether the reader can make the invention; written description asks whether the inventor had already conceived it. Failing the written description requirement is common when inventors try to add new matter to a continuation.

Examiner

A USPTO employee trained in a specific technical field who reviews patent applications for compliance with patent law. Examiners search prior art, write office actions rejecting or allowing claims, and conduct interviews with applicants or their attorneys. The examiner assigned to your application has significant discretion in how they interpret your claims and apply prior art.

Abstract

A brief summary (300 words or fewer) that appears at the top of every patent. The abstract describes what the invention does in general terms. Legally, it has almost no weight — courts use the claims to determine what a patent covers, not the abstract. The abstract is useful mainly for quickly scanning patents during a prior art search.

Anticipation

A legal standard for rejecting a patent claim. If every element of a claim was already disclosed in a single prior art reference — in a patent, article, or product — the claim is "anticipated" and cannot be patented. Anticipation requires a single source to contain every element; if you need two sources, it's an obviousness argument, not anticipation.