Skip to content
PatentBrief

Technology Patents

Solid-State Cooling Patents

Thermoelectric ZT materials, caloric refrigerants, and regenerator IP; solid-state cooling patent landscape for refrigerant-free startup founders.

FAQ

Who are the major solid-state cooling patent holders and what innovations do Phononic and the caloric players protect?

Solid-state cooling patents cover thermoelectric material and module innovations; caloric (electro/magneto/elasto/baro) material innovations; regenerator and cycle innovations; and system-integration innovations — with IP held by thermoelectric companies and emerging caloric startups (in a field replacing vapor-compression with solid-state, refrigerant-free cooling). MAJOR SOLID-STATE-COOLING PATENT HOLDERS: PHONONIC: solid-state thermoelectric (semiconductor) cooling devices and systems (refrigeration, cold chain, electronics/optical cooling), thermoelectric module and integration IP. LAIRD THERMAL / FERROTEC / II-VI(Coherent) / KELK: Peltier thermoelectric modules and materials. CALORIC PLAYERS: Camfridge and Magnotherm (magnetocaloric refrigeration), Barocal (barocaloric), and elastocaloric/electrocaloric researchers and startups; HVAC majors (Carrier, Haier) and labs (and the U.S. DOE) have electrocaloric/caloric programs. OTHERS: Marlow, TEGnology, Matrix Industries (thermoelectric harvesting), and academic foundational holders (the thermoelectric ZT-improvement and caloric-effect research from MIT, Maryland, and others). Thermoelectric materials/modules (the commercial incumbent in solid-state cooling) and the emerging caloric materials/cycles (electrocaloric, magnetocaloric, elastocaloric, barocaloric) are the core solid-state-cooling patent domains — and 'caloric' cooling promises efficiency rivaling vapor-compression WITHOUT refrigerants/GWP.

What thermoelectric material and Peltier-module innovations are patentable?

Thermoelectric-material (high-ZT) innovations; Peltier-module and architecture innovations; integration and heat-management innovations; and reliability innovations represent core thermoelectric-cooling patent domains — and the thermoelectric figure of merit ZT (efficiency) is the central material challenge. THERMOELECTRIC-MATERIAL PATENTS: materials with a high dimensionless figure of merit ZT (= S²σT/κ — high Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity, low thermal conductivity) — bismuth telluride Bi2Te3 (the near-room-temperature workhorse) and its alloys, plus higher-ZT candidates (skutterudites, half-Heusler, magnesium-tin-silicide, tin selenide SnSe, and NANOSTRUCTURED materials that scatter phonons to cut thermal conductivity while preserving electrical conductivity — a key strategy to raise ZT); n-type/p-type optimization and dopants. MODULE / ARCHITECTURE PATENTS: Peltier-module design (arrays of n/p thermoelectric legs sandwiched between ceramic plates), thin-film/micro thermoelectric coolers, leg geometry, electrical/thermal contacts, and segmented/cascaded modules for larger temperature lifts. INTEGRATION / HEAT-MANAGEMENT PATENTS: heat-sink/heat-spreader integration, system design exploiting solid-state advantages (no moving parts, precise/spot cooling, instant on/off, any orientation), and electronics/photonics cooling. RELIABILITY PATENTS: thermomechanical fatigue, contact degradation, and lifetime. Higher-ZT (especially nanostructured) thermoelectric materials and efficient module/integration are the highest-value thermoelectric IP — because thermoelectric cooling's main drawback versus vapor-compression is lower efficiency, so ZT gains are decisive.

What caloric (electro/magneto/elasto/baro) material and cycle innovations are patentable?

Caloric-material innovations; regenerator and cycle innovations; driving-field/actuation innovations; and system-architecture innovations represent additional solid-state-cooling patent domains — and 'caloric' cooling is the frontier promising vapor-compression-level efficiency without refrigerants. CALORIC-MATERIAL PATENTS: solid refrigerants that heat up or cool down when a field/stress is applied and removed — ELECTROCALORIC EC (electric field — ceramic/polymer dielectrics like PVDF terpolymers, PZT), MAGNETOCALORIC MC (magnetic field — gadolinium, La-Fe-Si, MnFe-based materials near a magnetic transition), ELASTOCALORIC (mechanical stress — shape-memory alloys like NiTi nitinol that release/absorb heat on loading/unloading), and BAROCALORIC (hydrostatic pressure — plastic crystals, ammonium salts with giant pressure-driven entropy changes); the material composition, the giant-caloric-effect tuning, and hysteresis/fatigue reduction are key composition-of-matter claims. REGENERATOR / CYCLE PATENTS: active caloric regenerators (cycling the material between hot and cold reservoirs while applying/removing the field to pump heat), regenerator geometry, heat-transfer-fluid design, and the thermodynamic cycle (the regenerator is what amplifies a small per-cycle temperature change into a useful temperature span). DRIVING / ACTUATION PATENTS: efficient field application (low-loss capacitor drive for EC, permanent-magnet arrays for MC, low-force actuation for elastocaloric, pressure systems for barocaloric) — minimizing the energy to drive the cycle. SYSTEM PATENTS: integration into refrigerators/HVAC. Giant-caloric materials with low hysteresis and efficient regenerator/cycle/actuation designs are the highest-value, most-novel solid-state-cooling IP because they could deliver refrigerant-free cooling at competitive efficiency.

What IP strategy should solid-state cooling startup founders use?

Solid-state cooling startup IP strategy must navigate Phononic and incumbent thermoelectric (Peltier) patents, emerging caloric patents (Camfridge/Magnotherm/Barocal and university), decades of thermoelectric and caloric-effect academic prior art (Bi2Te3 and the caloric effects are old physics), the efficiency gap versus mature, cheap vapor-compression (the existential commercial hurdle), refrigerant-phasedown regulation (AIM Act/F-gas — the tailwind making refrigerant-free attractive), and a landscape where material performance and cost decide success; understand that the basic effects are prior art, so the durable IP is in HIGH-PERFORMANCE materials (high-ZT thermoelectric, giant-caloric low-hysteresis), efficient regenerator/cycle/actuation, and system integration, and that beating vapor-compression on cost AND efficiency is the binding challenge; identify whitespace in nanostructured thermoelectrics, giant-caloric materials, regenerator/cycle design, and low-energy actuation. SOLID-STATE-COOLING STARTUP IP STRATEGY: THE EFFECTS ARE PRIOR ART — HIGH-PERFORMANCE MATERIALS, CYCLES, AND ACTUATION ARE THE IP: Bi2Te3 thermoelectrics and the caloric effects are old physics, so patent high-ZT (nanostructured) thermoelectric materials, giant-caloric low-hysteresis materials, efficient regenerators/cycles, and low-energy actuation — not the effect itself; CALORIC COOLING (NO REFRIGERANT, HIGH EFFICIENCY) IS HIGHEST-VALUE WHITESPACE: electro/magneto/elasto/barocaloric cooling could match vapor-compression efficiency WITHOUT refrigerants/GWP — the materials (giant effect, low hysteresis/fatigue) and regenerator/actuation designs are the most novel, valuable, least-consolidated IP; HIGHER-ZT NANOSTRUCTURED THERMOELECTRICS REMAIN VALUABLE: thermoelectric cooling's drawback is efficiency — ZT gains (phonon-scattering nanostructures) directly improve competitiveness; LOW-ENERGY ACTUATION AND REGENERATOR DESIGN ARE THE SYSTEM IP: the energy to drive the caloric cycle and the regenerator that amplifies the effect determine real efficiency — patent these; REFRIGERANT REGULATION IS THE TAILWIND: HFC phasedown (AIM Act/F-gas) makes refrigerant-free solid-state cooling strategically attractive — position for it; COST AND EFFICIENCY VS VAPOR-COMPRESSION ARE EXISTENTIAL: solid-state must beat cheap, efficient incumbents — measured advantage strengthens patents and the business; WHEN TO PATENT: NOVEL MATERIAL/SYSTEM WITH MEASURED PERFORMANCE: file once a material/system shows measured results (ZT or caloric adiabatic-temperature-change ΔTad + COP/efficiency + temperature span + hysteresis/cycle life + cost) vs. Bi2Te3/vapor-compression baselines — measured ZT/ΔTad, COP/efficiency, temperature span, and cycle life are the critical solid-state-cooling IP metrics; KEY FTO CHECKLIST: Phononic thermoelectric semiconductor cooling module/system; Peltier Bi2Te3 module (Laird/Ferrotec); high-ZT skutterudite/half-Heusler/SnSe/nanostructured phonon-scattering; thin-film/micro thermoelectric; electrocaloric PVDF-terpolymer/PZT; magnetocaloric Gd/La-Fe-Si/MnFe; elastocaloric NiTi nitinol shape-memory; barocaloric plastic-crystal/ammonium-salt; active caloric regenerator/cycle/heat-transfer-fluid; low-loss EC drive / permanent-magnet MC / low-force elastocaloric actuation; AIM Act/F-gas refrigerant phasedown.

Related Guides

Heat Pump PatentsData Center Cooling PatentsSilicon Carbide Power PatentsStartup IP Strategy