You can freely build on How a Spring-Loaded Pocket Dispenser Works
This patent expired in 1969. Every claim — 0 independent, 0 dependent — is now unenforceable. Anyone can use, reproduce, manufacture, sell, or offer for sale this technology without a license.
Original assignee
Individual
Patent granted
1952
Expired
1969
Forward citations
69
What this patent covers
The device functions as a compact storage unit designed to hold a stack of flat, uniform items. It utilizes a spring-loaded platform inside the casing that exerts constant upward pressure on the contents. When the user interacts with the top of the container, the spring ensures the next item is automatically positioned at the dispensing opening, allowing for one-handed retrieval.
What is now free to use
All 0 claims of US 2620061 are in the public domain. Specifically:
The 0 dependent claims add narrowing limitations and are also free.
What is NOT covered
Patent expiry frees this specific invention. Separately-patented improvements made after expiry may still be protected.
Does not cover containers that rely on gravity rather than spring tension to feed items.
Does not cover non-pocket-sized dispensing systems like large industrial vending machines.
Does not cover electronic or automated dispensing mechanisms that require a power source.
Who is building on this today
Companies specializing in consumer packaging and confectionery, such as the manufacturers of Pez, continue to utilize variations of spring-loaded dispensing mechanics for small, stackable items.
Products built on expired version of this technology
Pez candy dispensers
Pocket-sized breath mint containers
Small pill organizers
How to cite this patent in your documentation
Individual. US Patent 2620061. Pocket article dispensing container. Granted 1952, expired 1969. Now in the public domain.
Note: This is a convenience citation. Consult a patent attorney for formal freedom-to-operate analysis.
PatentBrief is an educational resource and does not provide legal advice. Patent expiration information is derived from USPTO records and may not reflect continuation patents, divisional filings, or separately-patented improvements. For commercial use or production decisions, obtain a formal freedom-to-operate (FTO) opinion from a registered patent attorney.