Skip to content
PatentBrief
← Glossary/O

Obviousness

Definition

A grounds for rejection under 35 USC § 103 when an invention, while not identical to any single prior artprior artEarlier patents, publications, or products that existed before this patent's filing date. Patent claims must be novel over the prior art.Read more → reference, would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention. Examiners frequently combine two or more prior art references to make an obviousnessobviousnessA 103 rejection: the invention would have been obvious to a skilled person who combined existing prior art. The most common rejection in patent prosecution.Read more → rejection. It is the single most common rejection in patent prosecutionprosecutionThe whole process of moving a patent application from filing through grant or abandonment at the USPTO.Read more →.

Related terms

Keep going

Office action

A written communication from a USPTO examiner to a patent applicant, typically containing rejections, objections, or requirements for the application. A "final office action" signals that the examiner has given the applicant one more chance to respond before the application is abandoned. Applicants generally have three months to respond (extendable to six months for a fee).

Abstract

A brief summary (300 words or fewer) that appears at the top of every patent. The abstract describes what the invention does in general terms. Legally, it has almost no weight — courts use the claims to determine what a patent covers, not the abstract. The abstract is useful mainly for quickly scanning patents during a prior art search.

Anticipation

A legal standard for rejecting a patent claim. If every element of a claim was already disclosed in a single prior art reference — in a patent, article, or product — the claim is "anticipated" and cannot be patented. Anticipation requires a single source to contain every element; if you need two sources, it's an obviousness argument, not anticipation.

Appeal

A request to have a patent examiner's rejection reviewed by a higher authority. After receiving multiple rejections, an applicant can appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) within the USPTO, and from there to federal court. Appeals are expensive and slow, but sometimes necessary when an examiner applies the law incorrectly.

Art unit

A group of patent examiners at the USPTO who specialize in a particular technology area. Each application is assigned to the art unit whose examiners are trained in the relevant field. The art unit assignment matters because examiner expertise — and rejection rates — vary significantly across technology areas.

Assignee

The legal owner of a patent, who may or may not be the inventor. When an employee invents something in the course of their employment, most companies require inventors to assign patent rights to the employer. The assignee appears on the patent document and has the right to license or enforce the patent.

See obviousness in real patents:

Search PatentBrief →