Skip to content
PatentBrief

Plant IP

Plant Variety

Plant varieties can be protected by utility patents (no saved-seed exception), plant patents (asexually reproduced only), or PVP certificates (seed-grown; research and saved-seed exceptions apply).

What are the three regimes for protecting plant varieties in the US?

Three distinct federal legal frameworks protect plant varieties in the US.

Utility Patent (35 U.s.c. §§ 1-376)

  • The strongest protection
  • Covers any plant variety (sexually or asexually reproduced; tubers included)
  • Protects: making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing
  • Can cover: the plant itself
  • The plant's seeds
  • Methods of using the plant
  • The plant's genetic traits
  • NO farm-saved seed exception under utility patent law — growers must purchase new seed each season
  • Diamond v. Chakrabarty (S.Ct. 1980): living organisms can be patented
  • JEM Ag Supply v. Pioneer Hi-Bred (S.Ct. 2001): utility patents can protect plants notwithstanding the plant-specific statutes
  • Term: 20 years from filing

Plant Patent (35 U.s.c. §§ 161-164)

  • Limited to ASEXUALLY REPRODUCED plant varieties (not grown from seed)
  • Covers: grafted, budded, cut, layered, divided plants
  • Does NOT cover: sexually reproduced (seed-grown) plants
  • Tuber-propagated plants (potatoes, Jerusalem artichokes)
  • Protects: the VARIETY (not the plant's parts or seeds separately)
  • Narrow scope: one claim per variety
  • Term: 20 years from filing

Plant Variety Protection (PVP) (7 U.s.c. §§ 2321-2582)

  • Administered by USDA (not USPTO)
  • Covers: sexually reproduced varieties (grown from seed)
  • Also: tuber-propagated varieties (potatoes)

Exceptions

  • Research exemption (researchers can use PVP-protected variety for research and breeding without license)
  • Saved-seed exemption: farmers can save seed for replanting own land under certain conditions
  • Certificate term: 20 years (trees/vines: 25 years).

What are the eligibility requirements for each plant protection regime?

Each regime has distinct eligibility requirements.

Utility Patent for Plants

  • Eligible subject matter: any plant variety meeting standard patent requirements
  • Requirements: novelty (§ 102)
  • Non-obviousness (§ 103)
  • Written description (§ 112)
  • Enablement (depositing seeds with ATCC or another depository may be required for full enablement of some varieties)
  • Deposit requirement: for varieties that cannot be fully described in writing, a biological deposit is required
  • Claims may cover: specific gene sequences
  • Transformed plants
  • Breeding methods
  • Phenotypic traits (e.g., 'a plant having drought tolerance > X')

Plant Patent

  • Eligibility: asexually reproduced — by grafting, budding, cutting, layering, division (NOT seed)
  • The variety must be:

Novel. Distinct from known varieties at filing date

Distinct. Clearly distinguishable from other known varieties

Uniform. Stable and uniform in its essential characteristics after reproduction

Not Found in Uncultivated State

  • Cannot be a variety discovered in the wild and merely reproduced
  • Application: one claim per variety
  • Claim describes the overall variety, not its parts

Plant Variety Protection Certificate

  • Eligibility: sexually reproduced or tuber-propagated varieties
  • The variety must be:

New. Not sold or disposed of to others for more than 1 year in the US or 4 years (6 years for trees/vines) abroad

Distinct. Clearly distinguishable from all prior known varieties

Uniform. Sufficiently uniform in relevant characteristics

Stable. Remains unchanged after repeated reproduction

Upov Compliance

  • US PVP implements UPOV 1978 (not the stricter UPOV 1991)
  • UPOV 1991 provides no saved-seed exception and stricter 'essentially derived variety' (EDV) rules.

What is the farmer's saved-seed exception and how does it work?

The saved-seed exception is a central policy distinction between utility patents and PVP certificates.

Under Utility Patent

  • NO saved-seed exception
  • Seed saved from a patented variety = making the patented invention
  • Each season's replanting requires new licensed seed
  • Monsanto Canada v. Schmeiser (Canada S.Ct. 2004): farmer who saved patented canola seed infringed, regardless of whether saving was intentional
  • US courts apply the same principle

Under Pvp Certificate

  • Saved-seed exception (7 U.S.C. § 2543): a farmer who purchases PVP-protected seed may save seed for replanting on own holding
  • Limits: saved seed may only be used on the farmer's own land
  • Cannot sell or transfer saved seed to others for reproductive purposes
  • The exemption is designed to protect traditional farming practices

Practical Limits

  • Modern hybrid seed does not reproduce true-to-type in the second generation — farmers have limited practical incentive to save hybrid seed regardless of legal status
  • Saved-seed exception mainly valuable for open-pollinated (non-hybrid) varieties

Research Exemption (PVP)

  • Any person may use a PVP-protected variety for research purposes without license
  • Can breed using PVP-protected variety as parent to create new varieties
  • The new variety developed using PVP material may be freely sold without license (unless it is an 'essentially derived variety')
  • This research exemption does NOT exist in utility patent law

Essentially Derived Varieties (EDV)

  • UPOV 1991 concept (not in US PVP under UPOV 1978): a variety that is predominantly derived from another variety but only differs in a few traits
  • EDV status means the EDV variety still requires a license from the original variety's rights holder
  • US PVP does not currently fully implement EDV provisions — a key difference from European PVP.

How do utility patents interact with genetically engineered plants?

Genetically engineered (GE/GMO) plants are primarily protected by utility patents.

Patent Protection for Ge Plants

  • Utility patents protect both the transgene (inserted genetic sequence) and the plant containing it
  • Protection extends to: the specific DNA sequence
  • The promoter elements
  • The transformation event (the specific insertion site)
  • The plant variety containing the event
  • Seed produced from the plant
  • Downstream growers' crops containing the patented trait

Seed Licensing

  • GE seed companies (Bayer/Monsanto, Corteva, Syngenta) license GE seed under technology agreements
  • Farmers agree not to save seed
  • Farmers agree to purchase new seed each season
  • Violation = patent infringement

Trait Stacking

  • Multiple GE traits from different companies may be in the same seed variety
  • Each trait is separately licensed
  • Technology use agreements (TUAs) govern the combined license
  • Cross-licensing between companies enables stacking

Patent Term and Trait Access

  • As Monsanto's original Roundup Ready (glyphosate tolerance) patents expired, competitors introduced generic Roundup Ready seeds
  • Farmers can access expired traits without technology agreement
  • Stacked traits with later expiration dates remain licensed

Brown Bag Seed

  • Selling or giving patented seed without license = infringement
  • Investigations and enforcement are active

Bolar Exemption

  • 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1): activities solely for developing information for regulatory submissions are not infringement
  • Broader than pharma context — may allow some research activities with GE plants for regulatory purposes

Gene Patents and § 101

  • Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics (S.Ct. 2013): naturally occurring DNA sequences (isolated from nature) are not patentable
  • Synthetic cDNA is patentable
  • GE plant genes that are synthetically designed or modified are generally patentable.

How do US plant protections compare to international regimes?

International plant variety protection differs significantly from US law.

International Union for Protection of New Varieties (UPOV)

  • The primary international framework for PVP
  • Two main acts: UPOV 1978 (US implements this version) and UPOV 1991 (EU and many countries implement this)
  • UPOV 1978 vs. 1991: 1978: stronger saved-seed exception
  • No EDV provisions
  • 1991: no saved-seed exception (except members may include narrow exception)
  • EDV provisions (essentially derived variety)
  • Broader breeder's right scope

European Community Plant Variety Rights (CPVR)

  • EU-wide protection
  • Administered by CPVO (Community Plant Variety Office)
  • Implements UPOV 1991
  • Covers all plant genera and species
  • Research and breeding exemptions
  • Saved-seed exception for farmers (small farmers exempt from royalties)

European Patents

  • European patents can also protect plants and plant breeding methods
  • BRÜSTLE case (CJEU) and similar cases restrict patenting of plant varieties under EPC Rule 27 (exclusion of essentially biological processes)

Japan

  • PVP under Seeds and Seedlings Act
  • Implements UPOV 1991

China

  • Plant Variety Protection Regulations
  • Implements UPOV 1978 elements
  • Growing importance for agricultural biotech

Developing Countries

  • TRIPS Article 27(3)(b): members may exclude plants and animals from patentability but must provide protection for plant varieties either by patents, by an effective sui generis system, or by a combination
  • Creates flexibility — many developing countries use UPOV-based systems rather than utility patents

International Seed Treaties

  • ITPGRFA (Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture): establishes a Multilateral System for access and benefit sharing of major food crops
  • Members exchange plant genetic material under standard terms.

Related guides

Plant PatentDesign PatentPatent Application TypesNovelty RequirementLicensing Programs