Skip to content
PatentBrief

International Patents · China

China Patent System

CNIPA's three patent types, how foreign companies file and prosecute in China, the security examination trap, dual-filing strategy, and how enforcement actually works in Chinese IP courts.

The essential rule

China is the world's largest patent filer by volume. CNIPA received over 1.6 million invention patent applications in 2023 alone. If your product is manufactured, sold, or used in China — protection there is not optional.

The three patent types

China's patent system at a glance

Unlike the US (one patent type for inventions), China has three distinct patent types administered by CNIPA. Understanding which type to pursue — or whether to pursue multiple — is the first strategic decision.

发明专利

Invention Patent

Term

20 years

Scope

Products + Processes

Examination

Full substantive examination

Timeline

2–4 years to grant

Use when

Core technology, major innovations, pharma, software processes

Equivalent to US utility patent. Requires novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability.

实用新型

Utility Model Patent

Term

10 years

Scope

Products only (no processes)

Examination

Formal examination only — no substantive review

Timeline

6–12 months to grant

Use when

Mechanical/structural inventions needing fast protection; dual-filing with invention patent

Sometimes called 'petty patent.' Easier to obtain but more vulnerable to invalidity challenges. Cannot cover chemical compositions or methods.

外观设计专利

Design Patent

Term

15 years (since 2021)

Scope

Visual appearance — shape, pattern, color or combination

Examination

Formal examination only

Timeline

6–12 months to grant

Use when

Product aesthetics, consumer goods, packaging, UI screens (post-2021)

Term extended from 10 to 15 years by 2021 Patent Law amendment. China joined the Hague System in 2022 for international design filings.

Filing routes

How foreign companies file in China

Foreign applicants must appoint a CNIPA-registered Chinese patent attorney — foreign attorneys cannot represent clients directly. All prosecution is conducted in Chinese.

Direct Paris Convention

Within 12 months (invention) / 6 months (design) of first filing

Best for: Companies with clear commercial interest in China and relatively simple prosecution

  1. File home-country application (USPTO, etc.)
  2. Within deadline, file Chinese application at CNIPA claiming priority
  3. Submit Chinese translation within time limit
  4. Pay CNIPA filing fees and appoint Chinese patent attorney
  5. Examination and prosecution in Chinese

PCT National Phase

By 30 months from priority date (no fee extension needed)

Best for: Companies evaluating commercial potential; complex inventions needing more time; multiple country filings

  1. File PCT application (through USPTO, EPO, or CNIPA as receiving office)
  2. Enter Chinese national phase by 30-month deadline
  3. Submit Chinese translation; pay national phase entry fees
  4. CNIPA sends first office action after national phase entry
  5. Prosecution in Chinese by local attorney

Critical rule

Security examination — the most common trap

Article 20 of the Patent Law requires that inventions made in China undergo a security examination before being filed abroad. This catches many foreign companies off guard when their Chinese subsidiaries or joint ventures develop technology locally.

Applies to

  • Inventions made in China by any person or entity
  • Chinese inventors working for foreign companies
  • R&D conducted at Chinese subsidiaries, JVs, or labs
  • Software and algorithms developed in China

Does NOT apply to

  • Inventions made entirely outside China
  • Inventions where no work was done in China
  • Non-Chinese inventors working abroad on their home country IP
  • Design patents and utility models (only invention patents)

How to comply

  • File in China first, request security examination
  • Wait for CNIPA clearance (typically ~4 months)
  • OR: File PCT through CNIPA as receiving office (automatic)
  • Do NOT file abroad before receiving clearance

Consequences of violation

  • Chinese application becomes void/unenforceable
  • Cannot cure the violation after the fact
  • Potential administrative penalties
  • Permanently bars patent protection in China for that invention

US vs China

Key differences from the US patent system

Grace period

12-month grace period for inventor's own disclosures before filing

No grace period for invention patents (very limited exceptions for academic publications and government exhibitions only). Disclose before filing = lose novelty.

First-to-file

First-inventor-to-file system (since AIA 2013)

First-to-file, no inventor exception. Whoever files first wins, period.

Patent types

Utility patent, design patent, plant patent

Invention patent, utility model patent, design patent (three types)

Examination delay

12–24 months typical for first office action

Invention: 18–36 months for examination. Utility model: 6–12 months (formal only).

Divisional practice

Divisional applications allowed during prosecution

Divisional applications permitted; voluntary divisional deadline stricter than US

Continuation applications

Continuation, CIP, continuation-in-part available

No continuation-in-part equivalent. New matter cannot be added after filing.

IPR/post-grant challenge

Inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) before PTAB

Invalidation proceedings before CNIPA Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Division; appeal to IP courts

Obviousness standard

35 U.S.C. § 103, Graham v. John Deere, KSR

Inventive step requires 'prominent substantive features and notable progress' — sometimes higher bar than US non-obviousness

United States

China

FAQ

China patent questions

What are the three types of patents in China?

China has three patent types: (1) Invention patents — the equivalent of a US utility patent, covering products and processes, with a 20-year term and full substantive examination. Average examination timeline is 2–4 years. (2) Utility model patents (shiyong xinxing) — covering only products (not processes), with a 10-year term and no substantive examination (registered after formal examination only, typically within 6–12 months). Utility models are sometimes called 'petty patents' and are widely used for incremental mechanical inventions. They can be asserted but are more vulnerable to invalidity if challenged. (3) Design patents — covering the ornamental appearance of a product (shape, pattern, color, or combination), with a 15-year term since the 2021 Patent Law amendment (previously 10 years). China also joined the Hague System for design patents in 2022, allowing international design filings through WIPO.

How do foreign companies file patents in China?

Foreign companies have two main routes: (1) Paris Convention national phase — file a home-country application first (e.g., USPTO), then file a Chinese application at CNIPA within 12 months (invention) or 6 months (design) claiming priority. Documents can be in English initially with a Chinese translation within a prescribed deadline. (2) PCT national phase — file an international PCT application, then enter the Chinese national phase by 30 months from the earliest priority date. This gives more time to assess commercial potential before committing to Chinese prosecution costs. A Chinese patent attorney (registered with CNIPA) must handle prosecution for foreign applicants — foreign attorneys cannot represent clients directly at CNIPA. Filing fees are payable in RMB and are significantly lower than USPTO fees.

What is China's security examination requirement?

Under Article 20 of China's Patent Law, any invention or utility model made in China must receive a security examination from CNIPA before the applicant files a patent application in a foreign country. To obtain clearance, the applicant must either: (1) file a Chinese application first and request a security examination, then wait for the examination result (typically 4 months) before filing abroad, or (2) file a PCT application through CNIPA as the receiving office, which automatically triggers security examination. Violations — filing abroad without security examination — can result in the Chinese application being voided and potential administrative penalties. This requirement applies to inventions made in China regardless of the nationality of the inventor or applicant. Inventions made outside China (e.g., at a US headquarters) are not subject to this requirement even if the applicant is a Chinese entity.

How is patent enforcement handled in China?

Patent enforcement in China can proceed through two parallel tracks: (1) Civil litigation in specialized IP courts. China established dedicated IP courts in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou in 2014–2017, and IP Tribunals in over 20 additional cities by 2019. The Supreme People's Court IP Division handles technical appeals. Chinese courts have become increasingly sophisticated and willing to award substantial damages — major awards of $100M+ have been issued in recent years. Chinese courts can issue preliminary injunctions (temporary restraining orders) in patent cases. (2) Administrative enforcement through CNIPA or local IP offices — faster than litigation but damages are capped. Administrative route is useful for stopping infringing products at trade shows or in markets. China has also strengthened its Customs IP recordation system, allowing rights holders to record patents with customs to intercept infringing imports and exports.

Can a Chinese utility model and an invention patent coexist on the same invention?

Yes — a dual-filing strategy is commonly used in China. An applicant can file both a utility model application and an invention patent application on the same day for the same invention. The utility model will typically grant in 6–12 months, providing early enforceable protection while the invention patent application undergoes full substantive examination (2–4 years). Once the invention patent grants, the applicant must abandon the utility model (they cannot hold both simultaneously on identical subject matter). This strategy is useful for companies that need quick protection in a fast-moving market but also want the stronger, more defensible protection of an invention patent in the long run. The utility model cannot cover processes — only products — so some inventions are not eligible for dual filing.

Related guides

International Patent FilingPCT Application GuidePatent CostsGrace Period (US)Patent NoveltyStandard Essential PatentsPatent LicensingPatent Infringement