Skip to content
PatentBrief

Industry Patents

Carbon Capture Patents

Climeworks DAC, Carbon Engineering, CCUS, and CO2 utilization IP; carbon capture patent landscape for climate tech startups.

FAQ

Who are the major carbon capture patent holders and what innovations do Climeworks, Carbon Engineering, and ExxonMobil protect?

Carbon capture patents cover direct air capture DAC sorbent and contactor innovations; post-combustion capture amine solvent and stripper innovations; geological CO2 storage and monitoring innovations; and CO2 utilization and electrolysis conversion innovations — with IP held by oil majors, DAC startups, national labs, and chemical companies: MAJOR CARBON CAPTURE PATENT HOLDERS: CLIMEWORKS: 200+; specific DAC innovations (specific specific solid sorbent DAC: specific specific amine-functionalized cellulose fiber sorbent from specific specific 400 ppm CO2 dilute air capture from specific specific 90% CO2 removal efficiency from specific specific temperature vacuum swing adsorption TSA/TVSA from specific specific 80-100°C steam low-grade heat regeneration from specific specific 250 kWh_th/tCO2 + 50 kWh_e/tCO2 from specific specific Orca plant 4,000 tCO2/yr Iceland 2021 from specific specific Mammoth plant 36,000 tCO2/yr 2024 from specific specific mineral permanent storage injection from specific specific $1,000/tCO2 2023 declining to $300-500/tCO2 target); CARBON ENGINEERING: 200+; specific liquid solvent innovations (specific specific KOH liquid solvent DAC: specific specific air contactor structured packing from specific specific KOH(aq) CO2 absorption K₂CO₃ slurry from specific specific slaker: specific specific K₂CO₃+Ca(OH)₂→2KOH+CaCO₃ from specific specific pellet reactor: specific specific CaCO₃ pellets from specific specific calciner kiln: specific specific CaCO₃→CaO+CO2 at 900°C from specific specific slaker: specific specific CaO+H₂O→Ca(OH)₂ from specific specific 8.81 GJ/tCO2 thermal energy from specific specific 2,000 tCO2/day commercial plant from specific specific $210-300/tCO2 projected); EXXONMOBIL: 3,000+; specific amine innovations (specific specific MEA monoethanolamine solvent: specific specific 30 wt% aqueous from specific specific CO2 absorption 40-60°C absorber tower from specific specific 15-20 vol% CO2 flue gas from specific specific 120-140°C stripper reboiler from specific specific 3.5-4.0 GJ/tCO2 regeneration energy from specific specific degradation oxidative from specific specific FGD flue gas desulfurization upstream); SHELL: 2,000+; MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES: 1,000+; NETL/DOE NATIONAL LABS: 500+.

What DAC sorbent, post-combustion solvent, and advanced capture technology innovations are patentable?

Novel DAC sorbent material and regeneration cycle innovations; advanced amine and ionic liquid solvent formulation innovations; and membrane gas separation and electrochemical CO2 capture innovations represent core carbon capture patent domains: DAC SORBENT PATENTS: CLIMEWORKS; GLOBAL THERMOSTAT; CARBFIX; MIT; CALTECH: specific sorbent innovations (specific specific amine-functionalized sorbent: specific specific polyethylenimine PEI mesoporous silica SBA-15 from specific specific 3-5 mmol CO2/g sorbent at 400 ppm from specific specific TSA cycle 80-100°C regeneration from specific specific humidity swing: specific specific moisture-induced desorption from specific specific dry adsorption 3× faster than wet from specific specific MOF metal-organic framework: specific specific Mg-MOF-74 35 cm³ CO2/g 1 bar from specific specific MIL-101 NH₂ 3.1 mmol/g at 0.4 mbar from specific specific IRMOF-3 amine-grafted from specific specific Mn-MOF cooperative insertion 4.1 mmol/g from specific specific electrochemical DAC: specific specific quinone redox active carrier from specific specific PCET proton-coupled electron transfer from specific specific faradaic swing 0.19 GJ/tCO2 projected vs. 250 kWh TSA from specific specific biphasic solvent: specific specific DBU guanidine base from specific specific CO2 carbamic acid precipitation from specific specific low temperature 40-50°C regeneration from specific specific 1.5 GJ/tCO2 vs. MEA 3.7 GJ); POST-COMBUSTION PATENTS: SHELL; MITSUBISHI; BASF; LINDE; TOSHIBA: specific solvent innovations (specific specific advanced amines: specific specific piperazine PZ 8 m 90°C 25% faster vs. MEA from specific specific MDEA methyldiethanolamine blended from specific specific CANSOLV Shell SO2+CO2 dual from specific specific ionic liquid: specific specific [P66614][2-CNpyr] 3.4 mmol CO2/g from specific specific no water no volatility from specific specific 2.0 GJ/tCO2 projected from specific specific structured packing: specific specific Sulzer MellapakPlus 252.Y from specific specific 15-25 m absorber from specific specific L/G 3-5 L/kg specific specific packed height vs. HETP); MEMBRANE PATENTS: MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH MTR; EVONIK; PENTAIR; AIR LIQUIDE: specific membrane innovations (specific specific polymeric membrane CO2/N2: specific specific PEBAX Pebax 1074 CO2/N2 selectivity 35 from specific specific Polaris MTR CO2/N2 50 1000 GPU from specific specific two-stage cascade 90% capture from specific specific facilitated transport: specific specific amine-containing fixed carrier from specific specific 800 GPU CO2 permeance from specific specific MOF polymer mixed matrix MMM from specific specific ZIF-8 SAPO-34 20% loading).

What geological storage, CO2 utilization, and carbon-to-products innovations are patentable?

Geological CO2 storage site characterization and monitoring innovations; CO2 electroreduction to fuels and chemicals innovations; and mineralization and enhanced weathering innovations represent additional carbon capture patent domains: GEOLOGICAL STORAGE PATENTS: SCHLUMBERGER; CHEVRON; BP; NETL; TOTALENERGIES: specific storage innovations (specific specific saline aquifer injection: specific specific supercritical CO2 >31.1°C >72.8 bar from specific specific 800 m minimum depth from specific specific injectivity 10⁻¹⁵ m² permeability 0.1-1 D from specific specific caprock seal integrity shale 10⁻²⁰ m² from specific specific monitoring: specific specific 4D seismic repeat survey from specific specific InSAR surface deformation ±1 mm from specific specific DAS distributed acoustic sensing fiber from specific specific wellbore integrity: specific specific cement bond log CBL from specific specific mechanical integrity test MIT from specific specific pMIT pressure MIT from specific specific EOR enhanced oil recovery: specific specific CO2 miscible flood from specific specific minimum miscibility pressure MMP from specific specific 1.1× MMP flood from specific specific 300-500 scf CO2/bbl oil recovery from specific specific basalt mineralization: specific specific CO2 + basalt → calcite CaCO₃ ankerite from specific specific Carbfix Iceland 95% mineral 2 yr vs. 1,000 yr sandstone from specific specific >100 g CO2/kg basalt from specific specific pH 9.5 alkaline); CO2 UTILIZATION PATENTS: OPUS-12/TWELVE; NEWLIGHT TECHNOLOGIES; CARBON RECYCLING INTL; LANZATECH; SAIPEM: specific utilization innovations (specific specific CO2 electroreduction: specific specific CO2+H₂O→CO+H₂ syngas Cu electrocatalyst from specific specific CO2→formate KHCO₃ electrolyte 85% FE Pb from specific specific CO2→C2H4 Cu⁰ nanoparticle 25°C 1 bar 60% FE from specific specific 2.3 V cell voltage 200 mA/cm² from specific specific CO2-to-methanol: specific specific CO₂+3H₂→CH₃OH+H₂O Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ 250°C 50 bar 50% per-pass from specific specific syngas fermentation: specific specific LanzaTech C. autoethanogenum 37°C 10 psi syngas ethanol 90% carbon efficiency); MINERALIZATION PATENTS: 44.01; CARBON BUILT; EDEN GEOPOWER; UCLA: specific mineral innovations (specific specific accelerated weathering: specific specific olivine Mg₂SiO₄+CO₂→MgCO₃+SiO₂ from specific specific grinding 10 μm 50× surface area from specific specific 1.25 tonne olivine/tCO₂ from specific specific concrete curing: specific specific CO₂ injection precast mixing from specific specific 5-10 wt% CO₂ uptake calcium silicate hydrate from specific specific 44.01: specific specific CO₂ injection ophiolite peridotite Oman from specific specific >10 Mt CO₂/yr geological mineralization potential).

What IP strategy should carbon capture and CCUS startup founders use?

Carbon capture startup IP strategy must navigate ExxonMobil (3,000+) and Shell (2,000+) broad post-combustion CCUS IP; understand that Climeworks and Carbon Engineering hold specific DAC process IP but adjacent sorbent materials and novel regeneration cycles are less encumbered; identify whitespace in electrochemical DAC at low energy cost, novel MOF sorbents, CO2 electroreduction catalysts with high selectivity, and novel carbon-to-products pathways — while understanding that policy-driven demand (IRA Section 45Q $180/tCO2 DAC credit) creates a commercial window: CARBON CAPTURE STARTUP IP STRATEGY: UNDERSTAND THE CARBON CAPTURE PATENT LANDSCAPE — OIL MAJORS HOLD BROAD POST-COMBUSTION IP; DAC IS LESS ENCUMBERED: ExxonMobil (3,000+) and Shell (2,000+) hold broad post-combustion CCUS IP (MEA absorber-stripper, flue gas handling) — however DAC IP is less consolidated; Climeworks and Carbon Engineering hold specific DAC process IP but many sorbent materials (MOFs, ionic liquids, biphasic solvents) remain open; ELECTROCHEMICAL DAC AND CO2 ELECTROREDUCTION ARE HIGHEST-VALUE LEAST-CONSOLIDATED IP DOMAINS: Electrochemical DAC (quinone PCET, biphasic swing 0.19 GJ/tCO2 vs. 250 kWh TSA) and CO2 electroreduction (CO2→ethylene Cu catalyst 60% FE) represent the fastest-growing patent domains with most whitespace — startups can own novel electrocatalyst compositions, faradaic efficiency records, and system integration IP; WHEN TO PATENT IN CARBON CAPTURE: NOVEL CAPTURE PROCESS WITH MEASURED ENERGY-PER-TON-CO2: specific novel carbon capture process (specific specific capture mechanism + specific specific sorbent/solvent/catalyst material + specific specific regeneration/conversion method) with specific measured performance (specific specific capture energy GJ/tCO2 or kWh_e/tCO2 at specific specific CO2 concentration ppm + specific specific CO2 capture rate % at specific specific flow rate + specific specific sorbent capacity mmol CO2/g and cycle life N cycles + specific specific selectivity CO2/N2 or Faradaic efficiency % for electrochemical + specific specific cost $/tCO2 at specific specific scale) vs. specific specific Climeworks 250 kWh_th/tCO2 TSA or specific specific MEA 3.5-4.0 GJ/tCO2 or specific specific Cu 60% FE ethylene baseline — measured energy cost per tonne CO2 at relevant concentration is the single most critical carbon capture IP metric; KEY FTO CHECKLIST: Climeworks amine cellulose TSA 250 kWh_th 90% capture 400 ppm Orca 4,000 tCO2/yr; Carbon Engineering KOH DAC pellet 900°C CaO 8.81 GJ 2,000 t/day; MEA 30 wt% 40-60°C 120°C 3.5-4.0 GJ/tCO2; PEI-SBA-15 5 mmol/g MOF Mg-74 35 cm³ MIL-101 NH₂; biphasic DBU 40-50°C 1.5 GJ; electrochemical quinone PCET 0.19 GJ; CO2→CO syngas Cu CO2→formate 85% FE; CO2→C2H4 Cu⁰ 60% FE 200 mA/cm²; saline aquifer 800 m supercritical 4D seismic DAS; basalt Carbfix 95% mineral 2 yr.

Related Guides

Solar PatentsGrid Storage PatentsHydrogen FCEV PatentsStartup IP Strategy