PatentBrief

DRAM — The Memory in Every Computer, Phone, and Server

Robert Dennard's 1968 IBM patent describes dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) — the one-transistor-one-capacitor memory cell that became the dominant form of computer RAM, scaling from kilobytes to terabytes over 50 years.

Granted 1968activeExpired 1987Owned by International Business Machines CorpInvented by Robert H Dennard

Original patent title: “Field-effect transistor memory

What this patent covers

The actual claim

This patent describes a memory cell consisting of a single transistor and a single capacitor. The capacitor stores one bit of data as an electrical charge (charged = 1, uncharged = 0). The transistor acts as a switch: to read the stored bit, the transistor is switched on, allowing the capacitor's charge (or lack of charge) to flow to a sense amplifier; to write a bit, the transistor is switched on and the capacitor is charged or discharged to the desired value. Because the capacitor gradually loses its charge over milliseconds (it 'leaks'), the memory must be periodically refreshed — hence 'dynamic' RAM. This periodic refresh is the tradeoff for using just one transistor and one capacitor per bit, making DRAM far denser than SRAM (which uses 6 transistors per bit).

What this patent does NOT cover

The boundaries

  • SRAM (Static RAM) — a different memory cell architecture using 6 transistors per bit, no refresh needed, faster but less dense
  • NAND Flash memory — a non-volatile storage technology (data persists without power), covered in a separate patent
  • Memory controllers and refresh circuits — the patent covers the individual cell, not the surrounding circuitry
  • Specific DRAM variants (DDR, LPDDR, HBM) — all use the 1T-1C cell principle but add different bus interfaces and timing

These exclusions are unique to PatentBrief — derived from the actual claim language, not patent-office boilerplate.

What made this novel

Before DRAM, computer memory was either magnetic core memory (expensive, slow, large) or SRAM (using 6 transistors per bit, which was expensive and large). Dennard's insight was radical simplicity: why use 6 transistors if you can store the bit in a capacitor and use just 1 transistor to access it? The tradeoff — needing to periodically refresh the capacitor to prevent data loss — was solvable in hardware. The resulting 1T-1C cell was so small that memory density could scale dramatically. Dennard also formulated 'Dennard Scaling' — the observation that as transistors shrink, power consumption scales proportionally, meaning smaller chips run cooler. This law held from the 1970s until the mid-2000s, driving 40 years of Moore's Law improvements.

Field-effect transistor memory(Primary claim)semiconductorscomputingmemoryelectronicsdata-storage

Schematic visualization of the patent's claim structure. Hand-drawn diagrams in progress for each landmark patent.

Where you've seen this

Real-world examples

01

The first commercial DRAM chip was Intel's 1103 (1970), which stored 1 kilobit — 1,024 bits — and replaced magnetic core memory in minicomputers

02

Modern DRAM (DDR5) stores tens of gigabytes on chips built from billions of Dennard's 1T-1C cells, using nanometer-scale fabrication

03

Every server in AWS, Google, and Microsoft's data centers uses DRAM as working memory — global DRAM production exceeds $80 billion per year

Why it matters

The bigger picture

DRAM is the reason computers can hold gigabytes of data in active memory at affordable prices. Dennard never received royalties — IBM owned the patent and cross-licensed it as part of industry-wide agreements. He went on to identify 'Dennard Scaling,' which predicted how transistor miniaturization would drive power efficiency improvements — until it stopped working around 2006 when quantum effects began limiting further scaling. The end of Dennard scaling is one reason CPU clock speeds plateaued in the mid-2000s and manufacturers turned to multi-core processors instead. DRAM itself continues to scale through extreme ultraviolet lithography and 3D stacking (HBM), but the fundamental 1T-1C cell Dennard patented in 1968 remains the basis of all of it.

Filed

July 14, 1967

Granted

June 4, 1968

Claim 1 — Plain English

What this patent covers

This patent describes a memory cell consisting of a single transistor and a single capacitor. The capacitor stores one bit of data as an electrical charge (charged = 1, uncharged = 0). The transistor acts as a switch: to read the stored bit, the transistor is switched on, allowing the capacitor's charge (or lack of charge) to flow to a sense amplifier; to write a bit, the transistor is switched on and the capacitor is charged or discharged to the desired value. Because the capacitor gradually loses its charge over milliseconds (it 'leaks'), the memory must be periodically refreshed — hence 'dynamic' RAM. This periodic refresh is the tradeoff for using just one transistor and one capacitor per bit, making DRAM far denser than SRAM (which uses 6 transistors per bit).

The clever bit

Before DRAM, computer memory was either magnetic core memory (expensive, slow, large) or SRAM (using 6 transistors per bit, which was expensive and large). Dennard's insight was radical simplicity: why use 6 transistors if you can store the bit in a capacitor and use just 1 transistor to access it? The tradeoff — needing to periodically refresh the capacitor to prevent data loss — was solvable in hardware. The resulting 1T-1C cell was so small that memory density could scale dramatically. Dennard also formulated 'Dennard Scaling' — the observation that as transistors shrink, power consumption scales proportionally, meaning smaller chips run cooler. This law held from the 1970s until the mid-2000s, driving 40 years of Moore's Law improvements.

What it does not cover

  • SRAM (Static RAM) — a different memory cell architecture using 6 transistors per bit, no refresh needed, faster but less dense
  • NAND Flash memory — a non-volatile storage technology (data persists without power), covered in a separate patent
  • Memory controllers and refresh circuits — the patent covers the individual cell, not the surrounding circuitry
  • Specific DRAM variants (DDR, LPDDR, HBM) — all use the 1T-1C cell principle but add different bus interfaces and timing

Patent Journey

From filing to expiry

Patent Filed

1967

Patent Granted

1968 · 1yr after filing

Highly Cited

191 patents cite this

Patent Expired

1987

PatentBrief Score

Impact Score

40/ 100

Moderate

Citation count

40/40

Highly cited

Claim breadth

0/20

Narrow claims

Recency

0/20

Older than 20 years

Assignee scale

0/20

Independent or smaller assignee

PatentBrief Impact Score — based on citation count, claim breadth, recency, and assignee scale. Not a legal assessment.

Claim text not yet imported for this patent.

Glossary

Key terms defined

refresh
The periodic operation of recharging DRAM capacitors before they lose their charge — happens thousands of times per second
capacitor
An electronic component that stores electrical charge — in a DRAM cell, charge presence = 1, absence = 0
1T-1C cell
One Transistor, One Capacitor — the fundamental DRAM memory cell structure described in this patent
volatile memory
Memory that loses its contents when power is removed — all DRAM is volatile, unlike flash storage

Citations

Patent lineage

Cites earlier patents

1

earlier patents this invention cites as foundations

View prior art →

Cited by later patents

191

later patents that build on this invention

View patents →

Stay in the loop

Get a weekly digest of new patents.

One email per week. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keep exploring

Related patents you should know

US 12564871 · 2026

A Fixture for Cleaning Showerheads with Multiple Separate Chambers

This patent describes a cleaning device for showerheads that uses a fixture with three or more separate internal compartments and channels to direct cleaning fluid to the showerhead's upper surfaces.

ASM IP HOLDING BV

US 12324579 · 2025

Surgical Stapler Battery Health Check During Operation

This patent describes a powered surgical stapler that can detect if some of its rechargeable battery cells are damaged while it's actually firing staples, helping ensure the procedure finishes safely.

CILAG GMBH INT

US 12471982 · 2025

Surgical Tool That Combines Energy Treatment and Stapling

CILAG's patent details a surgical instrument that applies therapeutic energy to tissue, monitors its properties, then deploys staples, adapting the stapling based on the initial energy treatment and monitoring.

CILAG GMBH INT

US 11918209 · 2024

Real-Time Surgical Instrument Status on Live Video During Operations

This patent describes a surgical system that shows live video from inside the body and overlays important information about the surgical tool directly onto the screen, helping surgeons operate more precisely.

CILAG GMBH INT

US 8697359 · 2014

How to Use CRISPR-Cas9 to Edit Genes in Human Cells

This patent describes a method and system for precisely altering gene expression in eukaryotic cells, including human cells, using an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system that targets and cleaves specific DNA sequences.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

US 4683195 · 1987

How to Make Many Copies of a Specific DNA Segment

This patent describes the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a fundamental process for making millions of copies of a specific DNA or RNA segment from a tiny sample, enabling its detection.

Cetus Corp

Semantically similar

You might also find these interesting

SEARCH ALL

US 4531203 · 1985 · Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co Ltd

NAND Flash — The Memory in Every SSD, iPhone, and USB Drive

US 2569347 · 1951 · Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc

The Transistor — The Invention That Made the Digital Age Possible

US 3138743 · 1964 · Texas Instruments Inc

The Integrated Circuit — Putting the Whole Transistor Radio on One Chip

US 2981877 · 1961 · Fairchild Semiconductor Corp

The IC Manufacturing Method That Made Silicon Valley Possible

View all →
US 6370526·2002

Google AdWords — The Auction System That Made Search Profitable

Patent monitoring

Get notified when International Business Machines Corp files a new patent

Get notified when this company files a new patent. Weekly digest · Confirm via email · Unsubscribe anytime.

Last reviewed: May 26, 2026 · PatentBrief is not a law firm and this is not legal advice.