DRAM — The Memory in Every Computer, Phone, and Server
Robert Dennard's 1968 IBM patent describes dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) — the one-transistor-one-capacitor memory cell that became the dominant form of computer RAM, scaling from kilobytes to terabytes over 50 years.
Patent Number
US 3387286
Status
Active
Filing Date
July 14, 1967
Grant Date
June 4, 1968
Expiration
~July 1987 (estimated)
Claims
0
Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Inventors
Robert H Dennard
Citations
191 forward · 1 backward
What it covers
This patent describes a memory cell consisting of a single transistor and a single capacitor. The capacitor stores one bit of data as an electrical charge (charged = 1, uncharged = 0). The transistor acts as a switch: to read the stored bit, the transistor is switched on, allowing the capacitor's charge (or lack of charge) to flow to a sense amplifier; to write a bit, the transistor is switched on and the capacitor is charged or discharged to the desired value. Because the capacitor gradually loses its charge over milliseconds (it 'leaks'), the memory must be periodically refreshed — hence 'dynamic' RAM. This periodic refresh is the tradeoff for using just one transistor and one capacitor per bit, making DRAM far denser than SRAM (which uses 6 transistors per bit).
What it doesn't cover
- —SRAM (Static RAM) — a different memory cell architecture using 6 transistors per bit, no refresh needed, faster but less dense
- —NAND Flash memory — a non-volatile storage technology (data persists without power), covered in a separate patent
- —Memory controllers and refresh circuits — the patent covers the individual cell, not the surrounding circuitry
- —Specific DRAM variants (DDR, LPDDR, HBM) — all use the 1T-1C cell principle but add different bus interfaces and timing
The clever bit
Before DRAM, computer memory was either magnetic core memory (expensive, slow, large) or SRAM (using 6 transistors per bit, which was expensive and large). Dennard's insight was radical simplicity: why use 6 transistors if you can store the bit in a capacitor and use just 1 transistor to access it? The tradeoff — needing to periodically refresh the capacitor to prevent data loss — was solvable in hardware. The resulting 1T-1C cell was so small that memory density could scale dramatically. Dennard also formulated 'Dennard Scaling' — the observation that as transistors shrink, power consumption scales proportionally, meaning smaller chips run cooler. This law held from the 1970s until the mid-2000s, driving 40 years of Moore's Law improvements.
Why it matters
DRAM is the reason computers can hold gigabytes of data in active memory at affordable prices. Dennard never received royalties — IBM owned the patent and cross-licensed it as part of industry-wide agreements. He went on to identify 'Dennard Scaling,' which predicted how transistor miniaturization would drive power efficiency improvements — until it stopped working around 2006 when quantum effects began limiting further scaling. The end of Dennard scaling is one reason CPU clock speeds plateaued in the mid-2000s and manufacturers turned to multi-core processors instead. DRAM itself continues to scale through extreme ultraviolet lithography and 3D stacking (HBM), but the fundamental 1T-1C cell Dennard patented in 1968 remains the basis of all of it.
Real-world examples
- 1.The first commercial DRAM chip was Intel's 1103 (1970), which stored 1 kilobit — 1,024 bits — and replaced magnetic core memory in minicomputers
- 2.Modern DRAM (DDR5) stores tens of gigabytes on chips built from billions of Dennard's 1T-1C cells, using nanometer-scale fabrication
- 3.Every server in AWS, Google, and Microsoft's data centers uses DRAM as working memory — global DRAM production exceeds $80 billion per year
Glossary
Generated by PatentBrief · Not legal advice · patentbrief.org
US 3387286 · 2026