Skip to content
PatentBrief

Climate & Energy Patents

Liquid Air Energy Storage Patents

Air liquefaction, cold/heat recycle (the efficiency key), turbine power recovery, system integration, and round-trip efficiency/grid value; cryogenic-storage patent landscape for long-duration-storage founders.

FAQ

Who holds liquid air energy storage patents and how does LAES work?

Liquid air energy storage patents cover liquefaction innovations; cold/heat-recycle innovations; power-recovery/expansion innovations; and storage/system-integration and efficiency/grid innovations — with IP held by LAES developers, industrial-gas companies, and turbomachinery/grid-storage firms (in a field of cryogenic energy storage). WHY LIQUID AIR ENERGY STORAGE: it stores energy by LIQUEFYING AIR — 'LIQUID AIR ENERGY STORAGE' (LAES), also called cryogenic energy storage; when energy is cheap/abundant, surplus electricity runs an air LIQUEFIER (cooling air to about -196°C until it becomes a LIQUID, which takes up ~700× LESS volume than gas); the liquid air is STORED cheaply in insulated tanks; when power is needed, the liquid air is PUMPED, WARMED, and allowed to RE-EXPAND into a high-pressure gas that drives a TURBINE/generator to make electricity; the APPEAL: LAES offers LONG-DURATION, GRID-SCALE storage using mostly OFF-THE-SHELF, mature industrial equipment (liquefiers, turbines, tanks from the industrial-gas industry) with NO exotic materials, NO geographic constraints (unlike pumped hydro), and very long life — a candidate for storing energy for many hours; the big CHALLENGE is ROUND-TRIP EFFICIENCY: liquefying air WASTES a lot of energy as heat, and re-expanding it needs heat, so naive LAES is inefficient (~25%); the KEY innovation is RECYCLING the 'cold' and 'heat': capturing the COLD released during discharge to make the next liquefaction more efficient, and storing the HEAT from liquefaction to warm the air during discharge — pushing round-trip efficiency toward 50-70%; the HARD problems: the LIQUEFACTION process, the COLD/HEAT RECYCLE (the efficiency key), the POWER RECOVERY/expansion, storage/system integration, and overall efficiency/grid value. MAJOR PLAYERS: HIGHVIEW POWER, plus industrial-gas, turbomachinery, and grid-storage companies. Liquefaction, cold/heat recycle, power recovery/expansion, storage/system integration, and efficiency/grid are the core LAES patent domains — and liquefaction, cold/heat recycle, power recovery, integration, and efficiency are the open whitespace. (Note: LAES uses MATURE equipment but lives or dies on ROUND-TRIP EFFICIENCY via cold/heat recycle — that integration is the core IP.)

What liquefaction and cold/heat-recycle innovations are patentable?

Liquefaction innovations; cold/heat-recycle innovations; thermal-store innovations; and waste-heat-integration innovations represent core LAES patent domains — and liquefying air efficiently and (critically) recycling cold/heat are the foundational, efficiency-deciding capabilities. LIQUEFACTION PATENTS: the CHARGING process — cooling and LIQUEFYING air efficiently (cryogenic REFRIGERATION cycles, e.g., Claude cycle), COMPRESSORS, expansion turbines, and the liquefier design; liquefaction methods are core, high-value IP (the liquefaction process — how efficiently electricity is turned into cold liquid air — is a key area, though it largely adapts mature industrial-gas liquefaction technology, so the novelty is in efficiency and integration). COLD / HEAT-RECYCLE PATENTS: the EFFICIENCY KEY — capturing and STORING the 'COLD' released when liquid air re-warms during DISCHARGE (to pre-cool the next liquefaction, dramatically reducing its energy) and storing the HEAT generated during liquefaction (to warm the air during discharge, boosting power output) — using thermal STORES (cold and hot) and tight integration; cold/heat-recycle methods are core, high-value, DISTINCTIVE IP (COLD and HEAT RECYCLE is the SINGLE BIGGEST efficiency lever and the CORE innovation of modern LAES — without recycling, LAES is hopelessly inefficient (~25%); with it, efficiency reaches 50-70%, so the cold/heat capture, storage, and integration are THE most important, defensible IP). THERMAL-STORE PATENTS: efficient cold and hot thermal STORAGE media and stores (overlaps thermal energy storage); thermal-store methods are high-value IP (the thermal stores that hold recycled cold/heat are central to efficiency). WASTE-HEAT-INTEGRATION PATENTS: using EXTERNAL waste heat (from a power plant/industry) or waste cold (from LNG terminals) to boost LAES efficiency dramatically; waste-heat-integration methods are high-value IP (co-locating LAES with a waste-heat or waste-cold source greatly improves efficiency — a key siting/integration advantage). Liquefaction, cold/heat-recycle, thermal-store, and waste-heat-integration are the highest-value core IP because liquefying efficiently and recycling cold/heat are exactly what determine LAES's round-trip efficiency and viability.

What power-recovery/expansion, storage/system-integration, and efficiency/grid innovations are patentable?

Power-recovery/expansion innovations; storage/system-integration innovations; efficiency/grid innovations; and standalone-cold innovations represent additional LAES patent domains — and generating power from the liquid air, integrating the system, and efficiency/grid value are where stored energy is returned and LAES competes. POWER-RECOVERY / EXPANSION PATENTS: the DISCHARGE — PUMPING the liquid air to high pressure, WARMING it (using stored/external heat), and RE-EXPANDING it through TURBINES to generate electricity, including multi-stage expansion and turbomachinery design; power-recovery/expansion methods are core, high-value IP (the discharge train — pumping, warming, and efficiently expanding liquid air through turbines to recover the maximum electricity — is a key area, with expansion-cycle and turbomachinery design (adapting mature turbines) being important for efficiency and power output). STORAGE / SYSTEM-INTEGRATION PATENTS: storing CRYOGENIC liquid air cheaply (insulated tanks — a major cost advantage, as cryogenic tanks are cheap and proven), and INTEGRATING the liquefier, thermal stores (cold and hot), and power-recovery train into ONE efficient SYSTEM — plus using external waste heat/cold; storage/system-integration methods are core, high-value, DISTINCTIVE IP (the SYSTEM INTEGRATION — combining liquefier, cold/heat stores, and power recovery into a tightly-coupled, efficient whole (Highview's process) — is where LAES's efficiency and economics are realized, making integration the key system IP, and cheap insulated liquid-air storage is a real cost advantage). EFFICIENCY / GRID PATENTS: maximizing OVERALL ROUND-TRIP EFFICIENCY and GRID VALUE — efficiency optimization, LONG-DURATION economics, fast response, and grid services; efficiency/grid methods are high-value IP, §101-aware for dispatch (round-trip efficiency and long-duration/grid-service capability are where LAES must compete with batteries and pumped hydro, so efficiency and grid-value innovations are key). STANDALONE-COLD PATENTS: providing useful COLD (refrigeration/cooling) as a co-product or service; standalone-cold methods are high-value IP (LAES can also deliver cold for data-center/industrial cooling — a valuable co-benefit). Power-recovery/expansion, storage/system-integration, efficiency/grid, and standalone-cold are the highest-value application IP because power recovery, tight system integration, and efficiency are exactly what make LAES deliver competitive, long-duration storage.

What IP strategy should liquid air energy storage startup founders use?

Liquid air energy storage startup IP strategy must navigate the mature-equipment/integration-is-the-IP reality (LAES uses mostly MATURE, off-the-shelf equipment (liquefiers, turbines, cryogenic tanks from the industrial-gas industry) — so the patentable value is NOT in the basic components but in the SYSTEM INTEGRATION and especially the COLD/HEAT RECYCLE that makes it efficient; the integration and efficiency innovations are the core IP, not the individual machines), the cold/heat-recycle-is-everything insight (ROUND-TRIP EFFICIENCY makes or breaks LAES, and the cold/heat RECYCLE (capturing discharge cold to aid liquefaction, storing liquefaction heat for discharge) is the single biggest efficiency lever and THE core, most-defensible innovation — without it LAES is ~25% efficient and uncompetitive), the mature-equipment-is-an-advantage insight (using proven, off-the-shelf industrial equipment with no exotic materials, no geographic constraints, and very long life is a real ADVANTAGE (lower technology risk, supply-chain access) — lean into it, but it also means competitors can assemble similar systems, so the integration IP and execution matter), the long-duration/siting-flexibility value (LAES's value is LONG-DURATION, GRID-SCALE storage with no geographic constraints (unlike pumped hydro) and cheap, scalable storage (just bigger tanks) — position around long-duration where batteries are uneconomic and siting flexibility matters), the waste-heat/cold-integration opportunity (co-locating LAES with a waste-HEAT source (power plant) or waste-COLD source (LNG terminal) dramatically boosts efficiency — site-integration is a key efficiency and IP angle, and the cold co-product (refrigeration) is a valuable co-benefit), the efficiency-vs-batteries reality (LAES's round-trip efficiency (50-70%) is lower than batteries (~85-90%), so it competes on LONG-DURATION, scalable, long-life, cheap-storage economics, not efficiency — be clear about the niche), the capital/scale reality (LAES plants are large capital projects (like other long-duration storage) — patents must support a long path, and execution/financing matter as much as patents), the integration-execution-moat (much of the moat is engineering and reliably building/operating an efficient integrated plant — execution and operating know-how can be a bigger moat than patents), and a landscape where liquefaction, cold/heat recycle, power recovery, integration, and efficiency are the durable assets; understand that integration and cold/heat recycle decide, so the durable startup IP is in cold/heat recycle, system integration, efficiency, and waste-heat/cold integration — with the cold/heat recycle, system integration, efficiency, and siting/long-duration economics often the real moat, and that round-trip efficiency, cost, long-duration economics, and FTO matter as much as patents; identify whitespace in cold/heat recycle, integration, waste-heat coupling, and efficiency. LIQUID AIR ENERGY STORAGE STARTUP IP STRATEGY: COLD/HEAT RECYCLE, SYSTEM INTEGRATION, EFFICIENCY, AND WASTE-HEAT/COLD INTEGRATION ARE THE IP: patent cold/heat recycle, system integration, efficiency, and waste-heat/cold integration; MATURE-EQUIPMENT/INTEGRATION-IS-THE-IP: LAES uses off-the-shelf equipment (liquefiers/turbines/tanks) — value is in SYSTEM INTEGRATION + COLD/HEAT RECYCLE, not the components; COLD/HEAT-RECYCLE IS EVERYTHING: round-trip efficiency makes/breaks LAES — cold/heat recycle is the single biggest lever + THE core defensible innovation (without it ~25% + uncompetitive, with it 50-70%); MATURE-EQUIPMENT IS AN ADVANTAGE: proven off-the-shelf equipment/no-exotic-materials/no-geographic-constraints/long-life = lower tech risk (but competitors can assemble similar — integration IP + execution matter); LONG-DURATION/SITING-FLEXIBILITY VALUE: grid-scale long-duration with no geographic constraints + cheap scalable storage (bigger tanks) — position where batteries are uneconomic; WASTE-HEAT/COLD-INTEGRATION OPPORTUNITY: co-locate with waste-HEAT (power plant) or waste-COLD (LNG terminal) to boost efficiency + cold co-product (refrigeration) a valuable co-benefit; EFFICIENCY-VS-BATTERIES REALITY: LAES (50-70%) lower than batteries (~85-90%) — competes on long-duration/scalable/long-life/cheap-storage not efficiency; CAPITAL/SCALE: large capital projects — patents support a long path (execution/financing matter); INTEGRATION-EXECUTION-MOAT: reliably building/operating an efficient integrated plant can out-moat patents; ROUND-TRIP-EFFICIENCY/COST/LONG-DURATION/FTO MATTER AS MUCH AS PATENTS: round-trip efficiency, cost, long-duration economics, and FTO drive value; WHEN TO PATENT: NOVEL LIQUEFACTION/RECYCLE/EXPANSION/INTEGRATION METHOD WITH MEASURED PERFORMANCE: file once a method shows measured results (round-trip efficiency + cost-per-kWh + duration + cold/heat-recycle effectiveness + power output) — measured round-trip efficiency, cold/heat-recycle effectiveness, and cost are the critical LAES IP metrics; KEY FTO CHECKLIST: Highview Power + industrial-gas/turbomachinery/grid-storage companies; liquefaction (cryogenic refrigeration/Claude-cycle/compressors/liquefier — adapts mature industrial-gas tech); cold/heat recycle (capture discharge COLD for liquefaction + store liquefaction HEAT for discharge/thermal stores — the single biggest efficiency lever + core IP); thermal-store (cold + hot stores — overlaps thermal energy storage); waste-heat-integration (external waste heat/cold from power plants/LNG); power recovery/expansion (pumping/warming/turbine re-expansion/multi-stage); storage/system integration (cheap cryogenic tanks + tightly-coupled liquefier-stores-power-train — Highview); efficiency/grid (round-trip efficiency/long-duration economics/grid services — §101); standalone-cold (refrigeration co-product); mature-equipment/integration-is-the-IP; cold/heat-recycle is everything; long-duration/siting-flexibility.

Related Guides

Compressed Air Energy Storage PatentsThermal Energy Storage PatentsGrid-Scale Storage PatentsStartup IP Strategy