Skip to content
PatentBrief

Industry Patents

Digital Product Passport Patents

Data carriers, verifiable credentials, supply-chain traceability, privacy-preserving disclosure, and ESPR compliance IP; digital product passport patent landscape for circular-economy startup founders.

FAQ

Who are the major digital product passport patent holders and what innovations do Circularise, EON, and Spherity protect?

Digital product passport (DPP) patents cover data-carrier innovations; identifier/data-model innovations; supply-chain-traceability innovations; and data-integrity, access-control, and compliance innovations — with IP held by traceability/circularity software companies (in a field attaching a verifiable digital record to physical products to carry sustainability and lifecycle data — driven by new EU regulation). WHY DIGITAL PRODUCT PASSPORTS: the EU's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and EU Battery Regulation MANDATE 'Digital Product Passports' — a digital record (accessed via a QR code/NFC on the product) carrying data about a product's materials, origin, carbon footprint, recycled content, repairability, and recyclability — to enable the CIRCULAR ECONOMY, transparency, and compliance (batteries first ~2027, then textiles, electronics, and more); this creates a large, regulation-driven market for DPP systems. MAJOR DPP PATENT HOLDERS: CIRCULARISE (supply-chain traceability/DPP, privacy-preserving), EON (Connected Products / CircularID — DPP platform, fashion/textiles), SPHERITY (decentralized identity/credentials for DPP), KEZZLER, TEXTILEGENESIS, plus GS1 (digital-link standards) and blockchain/traceability firms. Data carriers, identifiers/data models, supply-chain traceability, and data-integrity/access-control/compliance are the core DPP patent domains — and data carriers, interoperable identifiers/credentials, traceability/integrity, and access control are the open whitespace (in a standards-and-regulation-driven field).

What data-carrier, identifier, and data-model innovations are patentable?

Data-carrier innovations; decentralized-identifier innovations; data-model/interoperability innovations; and verifiable-credential innovations represent core DPP patent domains — and linking a physical product to its digital passport, and structuring the data so it's interoperable and trustworthy, are the foundations (heavily reliant on standards). DATA-CARRIER PATENTS: the link from the PHYSICAL product to its DIGITAL passport — QR codes, NFC/RFID tags, GS1 Digital Link (a standardized URL in the code), watermarks, and tamper-evident carriers; the data carrier and how it resolves to the passport is core (though much rests on GS1/standards — an FTO/whitespace nuance). DECENTRALIZED-IDENTIFIER PATENTS: identifying products/parties in an interoperable, decentralized way — Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs), unique product identities, and identity across the supply chain (Spherity); decentralized identity for DPP is high-value. DATA-MODEL / INTEROPERABILITY PATENTS: the structure/schema of passport data so it's INTEROPERABLE across companies/industries/the EU system — data models, ontologies, and mapping to regulatory requirements; interoperability (the hard part, since DPP must work across the whole value chain) is valuable IP. VERIFIABLE-CREDENTIAL PATENTS: making product claims TRUSTWORTHY and machine-verifiable — W3C VERIFIABLE CREDENTIALS (cryptographically-signed claims about a product/material), credential issuance/verification, and trust frameworks; verifiable credentials for product data are high-value (trust is the point). Data carriers (physical-to-digital link), decentralized identifiers/verifiable credentials, and interoperable data models are the highest-value foundational IP because linking products to trustworthy, interoperable passport data is the core DPP function (with standards alignment essential).

What supply-chain-traceability, data-integrity, and access-control innovations are patentable?

Supply-chain-traceability innovations; data-integrity/verification innovations; privacy/access-control innovations; and lifecycle-data and compliance innovations represent additional DPP patent domains — and tracing materials through complex supply chains, ensuring claims are TRUSTWORTHY, and controlling who sees what are where much of the real difficulty (and value) lies. SUPPLY-CHAIN-TRACEABILITY PATENTS: tracing materials/components through multiple supply-chain TIERS (raw material → component → product) to populate the passport (e.g., recycled-content/origin claims) — chain-of-custody, mass-balance accounting, and often BLOCKCHAIN/distributed-ledger or other tamper-evident records (Circularise); supply-chain traceability (across companies that don't trust each other) is high-value, hard IP. DATA-INTEGRITY / VERIFICATION PATENTS: making passport claims TRUSTWORTHY and TAMPER-EVIDENT — cryptographic proofs, verification of sustainability claims (carbon footprint, recycled content), and anti-counterfeiting/authenticity; data integrity is essential (a passport is only useful if its claims are trusted). PRIVACY / ACCESS-CONTROL PATENTS: a KEY challenge — different stakeholders should see different data (consumers see repair info, recyclers see material composition, regulators see compliance, while companies protect commercial secrets) — selective disclosure, ZERO-KNOWLEDGE proofs (prove a claim without revealing underlying data — Circularise's approach), and role-based access; privacy-preserving disclosure is high-value, differentiating IP (sharing data without exposing trade secrets is the crux). LIFECYCLE-DATA / COMPLIANCE PATENTS: structuring repair/recycling/disassembly instructions, material composition, end-of-life data, and mapping to specific REGULATORY requirements (ESPR/Battery Regulation); compliance-ready data systems are valuable. Multi-tier supply-chain traceability, data integrity/verification, and privacy-preserving selective disclosure (zero-knowledge) are the highest-value system IP because trustworthy traceable claims shared WITHOUT exposing commercial secrets are exactly what make DPPs work across competitive supply chains.

What IP strategy should digital product passport startup founders use?

DPP startup IP strategy must navigate Circularise/EON/Spherity and traceability portfolios, the STANDARDS-heavy nature (GS1 Digital Link, W3C verifiable credentials, EU DPP data standards — much of the framework is standardized/open, an FTO/whitespace nuance), the §101 (software/data) eligibility considerations, the REGULATION-driven timing (EU ESPR/Battery Regulation create the market and deadlines), the interoperability and privacy challenges, the platform-vs-data-vs-services model, and a landscape where data carriers, identifiers/credentials, traceability, integrity, and privacy are the durable assets; understand that the data-carrier/identifier framework is largely standardized, so the durable IP is in supply-chain traceability, data integrity/verification, privacy-preserving disclosure (zero-knowledge), and interoperable systems, and that interoperability, privacy, compliance, and standards alignment matter as much as patents; identify whitespace in privacy-preserving traceability, verification, and integration. DPP STARTUP IP STRATEGY: THE FRAMEWORK IS STANDARDS-HEAVY (GS1/W3C/EU) — TRACEABILITY, DATA INTEGRITY, PRIVACY-PRESERVING DISCLOSURE, AND INTEGRATION ARE THE IP: data carriers and identifiers rest on open standards (use them), so patent the harder, value-adding layers — multi-tier traceability, verification, and privacy-preserving disclosure — not standardized building blocks (and mind §101 for pure software/data); PRIVACY-PRESERVING DISCLOSURE (ZERO-KNOWLEDGE) IS THE KEY DIFFERENTIATOR AND HIGH-VALUE IP: sharing trustworthy product/supply-chain claims WITHOUT exposing commercial secrets (Circularise's zero-knowledge approach) is the crux of cross-supply-chain DPP — the most defensible, valuable IP; SUPPLY-CHAIN TRACEABILITY ACROSS DISTRUSTING TIERS IS HARD AND VALUABLE: chain-of-custody/mass-balance across companies that don't trust each other (and across the whole value chain) is a real, patentable challenge; DATA INTEGRITY/VERIFICATION IS ESSENTIAL (TRUST IS THE POINT): cryptographic, tamper-evident, verifiable claims are what make a passport credible; INTEROPERABILITY IS THE HARD REQUIREMENT (AND STANDARDS-DRIVEN): DPPs must work across industries/companies/the EU system — interoperable, standards-aligned systems are valuable (and standards reduce some patentability); REGULATION DRIVES THE MARKET AND TIMING: EU ESPR/Battery Regulation create demand and deadlines (batteries first) — align product and IP strategy to compliance; PLATFORM/DATA/SERVICES MODEL SHAPES IP: a DPP platform, data network, or compliance-services business protects different things; LIFECYCLE/COMPLIANCE DATA MAPPING ADDS VALUE: turning regulatory requirements into structured, compliant passports is a valuable layer; WHEN TO PATENT (WITH §101 AND STANDARDS IN MIND): NOVEL TRACEABILITY/PRIVACY/VERIFICATION METHOD WITH MEASURED VALUE: file once a method shows measured results (traceability depth/tiers + verification/integrity + privacy-preserving disclosure + interoperability + compliance coverage + scalability) — claimed as concrete technical methods — measured privacy-preserving traceability, verification, and interoperability/compliance are the critical DPP IP metrics; KEY FTO CHECKLIST: Circularise traceability/zero-knowledge; EON CircularID/DPP platform; Spherity decentralized identity/credentials; GS1 Digital Link (standard); W3C verifiable credentials/DIDs (standard); data carrier QR/NFC/RFID/digital-link/tamper-evident; decentralized identifier (DID)/product identity; interoperable data model/schema/ontology; supply-chain traceability/chain-of-custody/mass-balance/blockchain; data integrity/cryptographic verification/anti-counterfeiting; privacy/selective-disclosure/zero-knowledge/role-based access; lifecycle/repair/recycling/material-composition data; EU ESPR/Battery-Regulation compliance; §101 software/data eligibility; standards-driven FTO.

Related Guides

Battery Recycling PatentsTextile Recycling PatentsCarbon MRV PatentsStartup IP Strategy